Website review, no card needed

indojunkie.com logo

indojunkie.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202643 issues · 79 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on indojunkie.com, 14 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.2 sMay 23Nov 73.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Oct 31, 20263.0 s
Nov 7, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
142 ms125 msMay 23Nov 7128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026140 ms
May 30, 2026139 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026130 ms
Jun 20, 2026129 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026131 ms
Jul 11, 2026136 ms
Jul 18, 2026135 ms
Jul 25, 2026133 ms
Aug 1, 2026130 ms
Aug 8, 2026132 ms
Aug 15, 2026132 ms
Aug 22, 2026134 ms
Aug 29, 2026136 ms
Sep 5, 2026135 ms
Sep 12, 2026136 ms
Sep 19, 2026137 ms
Sep 26, 2026137 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026134 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms
Oct 24, 2026128 ms
Oct 31, 2026127 ms
Nov 7, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of indojunkie.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. indojunkie.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. indojunkie.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. indojunkie.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. indojunkie.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. indojunkie.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  6. indojunkie.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  7. indojunkie.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  8. indojunkie.com at 7.2 s7.2 s

Speed

8 to fix62
  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 1.4 MB

    30 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    30 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and stay22.com and others), adding 503 KiB and 526 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    351 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (351 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    339 KiB

    About 339 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 3.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 261 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    20 KiB

    About 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 115 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.1 s

    28.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.0 s

    15.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Munduk Bali: Unsere Tipps für das Wanderparadies”.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 460 ms

    460 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 460 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 127 ms

    127 ms

    Real visitors wait 127 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 8.8 MB in 174 requests

    8.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 174 requests on a phone: images 7.7 MB (99), scripts 948 KiB (39) and stylesheets 99 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 40 images in older formats

    40 images (3.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (785 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    293 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example kosten-bali-urlaub-edited.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 293 KiB.

  • About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.48 g of CO₂e: 298.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9790
  • 18 text elements with low contrast

    18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9280
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is short (34 characters)

    Your meta description is only 34 characters: “Der beste Reiseblog für Indonesien”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 285 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 285 pages on indojunkie.com and 8 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Indojunkie - Der beste Reiseblog für Indonesien”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://indojunkie.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://indojunkie.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://indojunkie.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,285 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix63
  • 1 page without a title

    https://indojunkie.com/feed has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 11 linked pages hidden from search

    https://indojunkie.com/bali, https://indojunkie.com/flores, https://indojunkie.com/java, https://indojunkie.com/kalimantan, https://indojunkie.com/lombok and https://indojunkie.com/molukken and 5 others are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://indojunkie.com/feed, https://indojunkie.com/java, https://indojunkie.com/kalimantan, https://indojunkie.com/molukken, https://indojunkie.com/papua and https://indojunkie.com/sumatra and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://indojunkie.com/sumba, whose canonical is https://indojunkie.com/insel-sumba-indonesien. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://indojunkie.com/feed has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 149 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “PLEASE NOTE: this is just a notification that the Sticky Menu (or Anything!) plugin is now working in Debug Mode.”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    36 of 42 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 416 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 416 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Zurück zum Shop”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Untermenü von Shop” and “Zurück zum Shop”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at indojunkie.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
netcup GmbH

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on indojunkie.com, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25