Website review, no card needed
indojunkie.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202643 issues · 79 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on indojunkie.com, 14 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74C- #70,981 of 100,782 reviewed websitesbeats 26%
- #43,555 of 55,598 online storesbeats 18%
- #1,268 of 2,337 WooCommerce storesbeats 39%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 140 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 128 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 1.4 MB30 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s30 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and stay22.com and others), adding 503 KiB and 526 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
351 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (351 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
339 KiBAbout 339 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Main-thread work: 3.1 s
A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 261 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
23 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
20 KiBAbout 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 115 ms
115 msYour server sent the HTML in 115 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 28.1 s
28.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.0 s
15.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sYour largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Munduk Bali: Unsere Tipps für das Wanderparadies”.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 460 ms
460 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 460 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 127 ms
127 msReal visitors wait 127 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.8 MB in 174 requests
8.8 MBYour homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 174 requests on a phone: images 7.7 MB (99), scripts 948 KiB (39) and stylesheets 99 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
40 images in older formats
40 images (3.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (785 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
293 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example kosten-bali-urlaub-edited.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 293 KiB.
About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit
2.48 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.48 g of CO₂e: 298.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
18 text elements with low contrast
18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is short (34 characters)
Your meta description is only 34 characters: “Der beste Reiseblog für Indonesien”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
285 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 285 pages on indojunkie.com and 8 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Indojunkie - Der beste Reiseblog für Indonesien”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://indojunkie.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://indojunkie.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://indojunkie.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,285 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://indojunkie.com/feed has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
11 linked pages hidden from search
https://indojunkie.com/bali, https://indojunkie.com/flores, https://indojunkie.com/java, https://indojunkie.com/kalimantan, https://indojunkie.com/lombok and https://indojunkie.com/molukken and 5 others are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
9 pages without a meta description
https://indojunkie.com/feed, https://indojunkie.com/java, https://indojunkie.com/kalimantan, https://indojunkie.com/molukken, https://indojunkie.com/papua and https://indojunkie.com/sumatra and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://indojunkie.com/sumba, whose canonical is https://indojunkie.com/insel-sumba-indonesien. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://indojunkie.com/feed has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 149 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “PLEASE NOTE: this is just a notification that the Sticky Menu (or Anything!) plugin is now working in Debug Mode.”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
36 of 42 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 416 words of copy
The homepage carries about 416 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Zurück zum Shop”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Untermenü von Shop” and “Zurück zum Shop”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at indojunkie.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- netcup GmbH
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on indojunkie.com, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.