Website review, no card needed

industriasgsl.com logo

industriasgsl.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202631 issues · 79 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on industriasgsl.com, 11 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.5 sMay 23Nov 72.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Oct 31, 20262.8 s
Nov 7, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
436 ms184 msMay 23Nov 7286 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026236 ms
May 30, 2026230 ms
Jun 6, 2026238 ms
Jun 13, 2026232 ms
Jun 20, 2026219 ms
Jun 27, 2026228 ms
Jul 4, 2026213 ms
Jul 11, 2026221 ms
Jul 18, 2026229 ms
Jul 25, 2026240 ms
Aug 1, 2026237 ms
Aug 8, 2026240 ms
Aug 15, 2026280 ms
Aug 22, 2026320 ms
Aug 29, 2026357 ms
Sep 5, 2026362 ms
Sep 12, 2026374 ms
Sep 19, 2026385 ms
Sep 26, 2026401 ms
Oct 3, 2026407 ms
Oct 10, 2026394 ms
Oct 17, 2026376 ms
Oct 24, 2026340 ms
Oct 31, 2026303 ms
Nov 7, 2026286 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of industriasgsl.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. industriasgsl.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. industriasgsl.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. industriasgsl.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. industriasgsl.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  5. industriasgsl.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  6. industriasgsl.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  7. industriasgsl.com at 7.4 s7.4 s
  8. industriasgsl.com at 8.5 s8.5 s

Speed

10 to fix55
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Main-thread work: 6.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,577 HTML elements

    The page has 3,577 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Clarity and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 769 ms

    769 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 769 ms of main-thread work and 529 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    705 KiB

    11 images could be 705 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 474 KiB

    About 474 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Shopify adds 389 ms

    389 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 389 ms of main-thread work and 474 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 419 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    80 ms · 58 KiB

    About 58 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 80 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    98 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (98 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    15 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 15 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 26 ms

    26 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 26 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.0 s

    17.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 866 ms

    866 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 866 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Real-user INP: 287 ms

    287 ms

    Real visitors wait 287 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors

    +26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 236 ms to 286 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 649 ms

    649 ms

    Real visitors wait 649 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 3.9 MB in 266 requests

    3.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 266 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (41), scripts 1.2 MB (64) and other files 907 KiB (141). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.11 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.11 g of CO₂e: 132.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9085
  • Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets (1 element)

    Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 24 text elements with low contrast

    24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 14 tap targets too small

    14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 134 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 12 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 14 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 12 passed and 2 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10095
  • Meta description is long (292 characters)

    Your meta description is 292 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 337 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 337 pages on industriasgsl.com and 13 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Industrias GSL - Ventas Online - Herramientas y Equipo Industrial”.

  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Industrias GSL - Ventas Online - Herramientas y Equipo Industrial”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://industriasgsl.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://industriasgsl.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://industriasgsl.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://industriasgsl.com/collections/plc, https://industriasgsl.com/collections/cables-de-red and https://industriasgsl.com/collections/fuentes-de-alimentacion-automatizacion have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://industriasgsl.com/collections/plc, https://industriasgsl.com/collections/hmi, https://industriasgsl.com/collections/modulos-de-entradas-salidas, https://industriasgsl.com/collections/cables-de-red and https://industriasgsl.com/collections/fuentes-de-alimentacion-automatizacion have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 186 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    5 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'removeEventListener')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Only about 25 words

    The homepage has only about 25 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • 9 short forms

    9 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 108 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 6 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at industriasgsl.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Doc 404 Broken Links Repair · Rapid Search Bar Filter · Quotes Guru Rfq · Microsoft Clarity · Bm Country Blocker Ip Blocker · Judge Me Reviews · Powerful Form Builder · Wf Request For Quote · Boostymark Regionblock · retailcrm.tech · cloudfront.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Hidalgo

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on industriasgsl.com, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25