Website review, no card needed
infoicontechnologies.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202635 issues · 63 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on infoicontechnologies.com, 11 of them high impact, across 63 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 7.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 163 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 210 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.0 s
2.7 s
3.4 s
4.0 s
4.7 s
5.4 s
Speed
3,066 HTML elements
The page has 3,066 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.9 MB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.9 MB).
Mobile performance score: 74
74/100Your mobile performance score is 74. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, getmyai.ai and Google Fonts and others), adding 3.4 MB and 247 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 287 KiBAbout 287 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
cloudfront.net adds 0 ms
0 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 195 ms
195 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 195 ms of main-thread work and 339 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 99 KiBAbout 99 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 14 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 136 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
35 KiB35 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 816 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 142 ms
142 msYour server sent the HTML in 142 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 7.3 s
7.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 7.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 18.2 s
18.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s
3.4 sThe first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 217 ms
217 msReal visitors wait 217 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.24
0.24For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.4 s
3.4 sYour largest element takes 3.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “10000+ Solutions has been delivered at various platforms. 1…”. Most of its time is element render delay (1.5 s).
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 158 ms to 210 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.1 s to 7.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 190 ms
190 msScripts block the page for only 190 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.066
0.066The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.066, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.9 MB in 98 requests
6.9 MBYour homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (37), other files 2.6 MB (22) and scripts 756 KiB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.94 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.94 g of CO₂e: 233.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (84 characters)
Your title is 84 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Web & Mobile Apps Development | Software | AR/VR Development | InfoIcon Technologies”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (161 characters)
Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.infoicontechnologies.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 7,700 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.infoicontechnologies.com/llms.txt (7 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 7,700 words of copy
The homepage carries about 7,700 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Learn more”.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at infoicontechnologies.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Akamai Cloud
Company
- Headquarters
- United States
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on infoicontechnologies.com, including 16 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.