Website review, no card needed
infotechinc.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202641 issues · 105 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on infotechinc.com, 16 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 131 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.8 s · 1.0 MBAbout 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.9 s · 486 KiB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (486 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
2.7 s46 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.8 s
A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
950 ms · 3.6 MB22 images could be 3.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 950 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 2.9 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 595 ms
595 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 595 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 527 ms
527 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 527 ms of main-thread work and 666 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 50 KiBAbout 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Hubspot adds 157 ms
157 msHubspot costs a phone 157 ms of main-thread work and 966 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 246 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 15.9 s
15.9 sThe first text or image appears after 15.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 35.0 s
35.0 sYour largest element takes 35.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Unified Civil Intelligence Infotech provides digital soluti…”.
Speed Index: 15.9 s
15.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 35.2 s
35.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 807 ms
807 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 807 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 132 ms to 131 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 161 ms
161 msReal visitors wait 161 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.5 MB in 190 requests
11.5 MBYour homepage downloads 11.5 MB in 190 requests on a phone: images 6.5 MB (51), scripts 2.6 MB (55) and fonts 1.8 MB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
Infotech_UCI_Homepage_CycleWithHuman.svg weighs 1.6 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (880 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
5 images far larger than shown
467 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example home_tablet_BidExpress.webp at 2,500 px wide, shown at 312 px. Resized copies would save about 467 KiB.
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.26 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.26 g of CO₂e: 391.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (2 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
71 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 71 pages on infotechinc.com and 10 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Optimize infrastructure lifecycle management with Infotech. Our Unified Civil Intelligence connects data + workflows to…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Unified Civil Intelligence”.
Title: 37 characters
Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “Infotech | Unified Civil Intelligence”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.infotechinc.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.infotechinc.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,117 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (195 KiB, 347 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Load failed, error in settings”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://infotechinc.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://infotechinc.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (infotechinc.com).
Valid certificate (40 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for infotechinc.com and is valid for another 40 days.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 50 links work
All 50 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 10 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
infotechinc.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
infotechinc.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 31 years old
31 yearsinfotechinc.com was registered in Oct 1995 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Oct 2029
infotechinc.com is registered until Oct 2029.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 989 words of copy
The homepage carries about 989 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK DEMO” and “LEARN MORE”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “BOOK DEMO” and “LEARN MORE”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and HubSpot.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:amazonses.com include:21579207…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
43 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.4.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 3.7.1
- Framework
- Vue.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- WP Engine
Company
- Employees
- 272
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on infotechinc.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.