Website review, no card needed

ingo.it logo

ingo.it website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202632 issues · 79 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on ingo.it, 11 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.1 sMay 9Oct 241.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
121 ms94 msMay 9Oct 24118 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026103 ms
May 16, 2026109 ms
May 23, 2026110 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026114 ms
Jun 13, 2026106 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 202698 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 2026100 ms
Jul 18, 2026103 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026107 ms
Aug 8, 2026110 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026110 ms
Sep 19, 2026113 ms
Sep 26, 2026112 ms
Oct 3, 2026109 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026111 ms
Oct 24, 2026118 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ingo.it (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ingo.it at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. ingo.it at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. ingo.it at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. ingo.it at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. ingo.it at 4.1 s4.1 s
  6. ingo.it at 4.9 s4.9 s
  7. ingo.it at 5.7 s5.7 s
  8. ingo.it at 6.5 s6.5 s

Speed

10 to fix70
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 397 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (397 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 4.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 2.8 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google CDN adds 669 ms

    669 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 669 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    600 ms

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 363 ms

    363 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 363 ms of main-thread work and 524 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Hubspot adds 217 ms

    217 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 217 ms of main-thread work and 405 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    233 KiB

    8 images could be 233 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 136 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    44 KiB

    About 44 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 116 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 24.9 s

    24.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.7 s

    8.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 524 ms

    524 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 524 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Your largest element takes 3.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Automazione intelligente per una CX che fa la differenza”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 118 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 116 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 116 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (29), images 958 KiB (42) and other files 725 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 24 images below the first screen load straight away

    24 images further down the page (728 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    35 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example agn-energia.webp at 675 px wide, shown at 126 px. Resized copies would save about 35 KiB.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.41 g of CO₂e: 169.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8693
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (6 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 61 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9295
  • Meta description is long (189 characters)

    Your meta description is 189 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 101 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 101 pages on ingo.it and 5 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Automazione intelligente per una CX che fa la differenza”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Home - Customer experience e omnichannel solutions | Ingo”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://ingo.it/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ingo.it/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://ingo.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,224 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://ingo.it/chi-siamo/azienda, https://ingo.it/chi-siamo/positive-impact, https://ingo.it/chi-siamo/meet-us, https://ingo.it/chi-siamo/lavora-con-noi, https://ingo.it/mercato/healthcare and https://ingo.it/mercato/e-commerce and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'hooks')”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,188 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,188 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ingo.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
OVHcloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on ingo.it, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25