Website review, no card needed

innisfree.jp logo

innisfree.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202649 issues · 91 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on innisfree.jp, 18 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.5 sMay 23Nov 71.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.8 s
Nov 7, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
218 ms168 msMay 23Nov 7204 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026174 ms
May 30, 2026178 ms
Jun 6, 2026182 ms
Jun 13, 2026182 ms
Jun 20, 2026187 ms
Jun 27, 2026188 ms
Jul 4, 2026188 ms
Jul 11, 2026188 ms
Jul 18, 2026183 ms
Jul 25, 2026184 ms
Aug 1, 2026187 ms
Aug 8, 2026189 ms
Aug 15, 2026200 ms
Aug 22, 2026204 ms
Aug 29, 2026204 ms
Sep 5, 2026203 ms
Sep 12, 2026193 ms
Sep 19, 2026195 ms
Sep 26, 2026204 ms
Oct 3, 2026212 ms
Oct 10, 2026210 ms
Oct 17, 2026207 ms
Oct 24, 2026203 ms
Oct 31, 2026200 ms
Nov 7, 2026204 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of innisfree.jp (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. innisfree.jp at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. innisfree.jp at 2.9 s2.9 s
  3. innisfree.jp at 4.3 s4.3 s
  4. innisfree.jp at 5.7 s5.7 s
  5. innisfree.jp at 7.2 s7.2 s
  6. innisfree.jp at 8.6 s8.6 s
  7. innisfree.jp at 10.0 s10.0 s
  8. innisfree.jp at 11.5 s11.5 s

Speed

14 to fix35
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.8 s · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 10.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3,811 HTML elements

    The page has 3,811 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, visumo.io and loox.io and others), adding 2.7 MB and 3.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 708 KiB

    21 images could be 708 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 875 ms

    875 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 875 ms of main-thread work and 832 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • visumo.io adds 616 ms

    616 ms

    visumo.io costs a phone 616 ms of main-thread work and 1,008 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    702 KiB

    29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (702 KiB).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 492 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.

  • Facebook adds 310 ms

    310 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 310 ms of main-thread work and 298 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • loox.io adds 335 ms

    335 ms

    loox.io costs a phone 335 ms of main-thread work and 27 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • TikTok adds 283 ms

    283 ms

    TikTok costs a phone 283 ms of main-thread work and 167 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 73 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 73 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    About 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    33 KiB

    33 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 60.7 s

    60.7 s

    Your largest element takes 60.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 34.0 s

    34.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 34.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 79.7 s

    79.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 79.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 233 ms

    233 ms

    Real visitors wait 233 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 174 ms to 204 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 454 ms

    454 ms

    Real visitors wait 454 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 14.8 MB in 335 requests

    14.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.8 MB in 335 requests on a phone: fonts 9.4 MB (8), scripts 3.1 MB (103) and images 1.4 MB (58). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (112 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.20 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.20 g of CO₂e: 503.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

14 to fixGoogle 7083
  • Images must have alternative text (2 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 31 text elements with low contrast

    31 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (17 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 13 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “イニスフリー 日本公式 オンラインショップ”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (302 characters)

    Your meta description is 302 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 269 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 269 pages on innisfree.jp and 3 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “イニスフリー 日本公式”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.innisfree.jp/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.innisfree.jp/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.innisfree.jp/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.innisfree.jp/collections/recommended-products and https://www.innisfree.jp/collections/part-care have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.innisfree.jp/blogs/notice/%E3%83%AA%E3%83%8B%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AB%E3%81%AB%E4%BC%B4%E3%81%86%E4%BC%9A%E5%93%A1%E6%83%85%E5%A0%B1%E7%A7%BB%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%AB%E9%96%A2%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E5%A4%A7%E5%88%87%E3%81%AA%E3%81%8A%E7%9F%A5%E3%82%89%E3%81%9B, whose canonical is https://www.innisfree.jp/blogs/notice/%e3%83%aa%e3%83%8b%e3%83%a5%e3%83%bc%e3%82%a2%e3%83%ab%e3%81%ab%e4%bc%b4%e3%81%86%e4%bc%9a%e5%93%a1%e6%83%85%e5%a0%b1%e7%a7%bb%e8%a1%8c%e3%81%ab%e9%96%a2%e3%81%99%e3%82%8b%e5%a4%a7%e5%88%87%e3%81%aa%e3%81%8a%e7%9f%a5%e3%82%89%e3%81%9b. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.innisfree.jp/blogs/notice/%E3%83%AA%E3%83%8B%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AB%E3%81%AB%E4%BC%B4%E3%81%86%E4%BC%9A%E5%93%A1%E6%83%85%E5%A0%B1%E7%A7%BB%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%AB%E9%96%A2%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E5%A4%A7%E5%88%87%E3%81%AA%E3%81%8A%E7%9F%A5%E3%82%89%E3%81%9B has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.innisfree.jp/blogs/notice/%E3%83%AA%E3%83%8B%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AB%E3%81%AB%E4%BC%B4%E3%81%86%E4%BC%9A%E5%93%A1%E6%83%85%E5%A0%B1%E7%A7%BB%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%AB%E9%96%A2%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E5%A4%A7%E5%88%87%E3%81%AA%E3%81%8A%E7%9F%A5%E3%82%89%E3%81%9B has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 103 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to execute 'observe' on 'MutationObserver': parameter 1 is not of type 'Node'.”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    65 of 67 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix43
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 110 words

    The homepage has only about 110 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 33 cookies set on arrival

    33

    Opening the homepage sets 33 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 52 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 52 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at innisfree.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Microsoft Clarity · Helium Customer Fields · Hulk Form Builder · Pop Convert · Omnisend · Forms · Simple Social Login · Searchstash · loox.io

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Hiring

Hiring
1 open role
Job board
smartrecruiters

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on innisfree.jp, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25