Website review, no card needed

innovid.com logo

innovid.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202642 issues · 92 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on innovid.com, 12 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
180 ms141 msMay 9Oct 24158 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026147 ms
May 16, 2026151 ms
May 23, 2026145 ms
May 30, 2026149 ms
Jun 6, 2026151 ms
Jun 13, 2026154 ms
Jun 20, 2026167 ms
Jun 27, 2026172 ms
Jul 4, 2026175 ms
Jul 11, 2026170 ms
Jul 18, 2026163 ms
Jul 25, 2026158 ms
Aug 1, 2026156 ms
Aug 8, 2026156 ms
Aug 15, 2026163 ms
Aug 22, 2026165 ms
Aug 29, 2026167 ms
Sep 5, 2026165 ms
Sep 12, 2026156 ms
Sep 19, 2026152 ms
Sep 26, 2026156 ms
Oct 3, 2026158 ms
Oct 10, 2026161 ms
Oct 17, 2026161 ms
Oct 24, 2026158 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of innovid.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. innovid.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. innovid.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. innovid.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. innovid.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  5. innovid.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  6. innovid.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  7. innovid.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  8. innovid.com at 6.1 s6.1 s

Speed

11 to fix53
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.5 s · 745 KiB

    About 745 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.0 s · 290 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (290 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Google Tag Manager and Unpkg and others), adding 23.0 MB and 970 ms of main-thread time.

  • Vimeo adds 89 ms

    89 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 89 ms of main-thread work and 14.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • website-files.com adds 328 ms

    328 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 7.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    700 ms · 251 KiB

    8 images could be 251 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 700 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    650 ms · 62 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    380 ms · 62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 380 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 120 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Real visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 51.3 s

    51.3 s

    Your largest element takes 51.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Innovid campaign analytics dashboard”.

  • Time to Interactive: 51.4 s

    51.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 51.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 203 ms

    203 ms

    Real visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 511 ms

    511 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 511 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 158 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 23.5 MB in 96 requests

    23.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 23.5 MB in 96 requests on a phone: other files 20.9 MB (31), scripts 1.3 MB (23) and images 645 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    7 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 6a218067eeda68163b561d6c_adserving_feature_02_img 1.webp at 374 px wide, shown at 119 px. Resized copies would save about 7 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (173 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 6.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.67 g of CO₂e: 799.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8991
  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (5 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 73 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is long (74 characters)

    Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “The premier global independent, omnichannel advertising platform | Innovid”.

  • Meta description is long (170 characters)

    Your meta description is 170 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 96 internal links, 27 external

    The homepage links to 96 pages on innovid.com and 27 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Turn complexity into performance”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.innovid.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Corporation.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.innovid.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (902 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.innovid.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 56 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.innovid.com/platform/ad-authoring, https://www.innovid.com/platform/audience-management and https://www.innovid.com/platform/conversion-intelligence use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://info.mediaocean.com/js/forms2/css/forms2-theme-simple.css' from origin 'https://ww…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    9 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix75
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 39 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 324 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 324 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get demo”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Contact us” and “Get demo”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 23 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at innovid.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Webflow

Company

Founded
2007
Headquarters
New York City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on innovid.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25