Programmable

Website review, no card needed

integranxt.com logo

integranxt.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202618 issues · 69 checks

This review found 18 issues worth fixing on integranxt.com, 3 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

85B

Closest competitors among reviewed websites

Compare side by side
Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.5 sMay 9Oct 242.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
146 ms127 msMay 9Oct 24134 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026129 ms
May 16, 2026131 ms
May 23, 2026131 ms
May 30, 2026134 ms
Jun 6, 2026134 ms
Jun 13, 2026130 ms
Jun 20, 2026130 ms
Jun 27, 2026130 ms
Jul 4, 2026134 ms
Jul 11, 2026136 ms
Jul 18, 2026134 ms
Jul 25, 2026136 ms
Aug 1, 2026136 ms
Aug 8, 2026139 ms
Aug 15, 2026144 ms
Aug 22, 2026141 ms
Aug 29, 2026141 ms
Sep 5, 2026138 ms
Sep 12, 2026134 ms
Sep 19, 2026135 ms
Sep 26, 2026133 ms
Oct 3, 2026133 ms
Oct 10, 2026134 ms
Oct 17, 2026133 ms
Oct 24, 2026134 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

integranxt.com (opens in a new tab)
Full-page screenshot of integranxt.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. integranxt.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. integranxt.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. integranxt.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. integranxt.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. integranxt.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. integranxt.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. integranxt.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. integranxt.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

1 to fix86

  • Mobile performance score: 86

    86/100

    Your mobile performance score is 86 (desktop: 86). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    51 KiB

    1 image could be 51 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare and Google Fonts), adding 36 KiB and 4 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed

  • Main-thread work: 0.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 103 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 27 ms

    27 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67

  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Your largest element takes 3.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Main Banner Image”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.0 s).

  • Speed Index: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 134 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed

  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The page is fully interactive after 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100

  • About 0.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.13 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.13 g of CO₂e: 15.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed

  • Page weight: 463 KiB in 15 requests

    463 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 463 KiB in 15 requests on a phone: images 342 KiB (4), HTML 39 KiB (1) and scripts 29 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 10095

  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 47 links without text

    47 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed

  • Every image has alt text

    All 82 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9284

  • Title is long (71 characters)

    Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Publishing Services for Books, Journals, K-12, Higher Education and ELT”.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 2 is not valid JSON (Unexpected end of JSON input)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 151 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 151 pages on integranxt.com and 15 external pages.

5 checks passed

  • Meta description: 122 characters

    Your meta description is 122 characters: “Explore publishing services that combine human expertise with intelligent technology for exceptional publishing solutio…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “From Content to Impact Powering Publishers to Deliver Trusted Knowledge”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://integranxt.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://integranxt.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed

  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,307 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://integranxt.com/llms.txt (11 KiB, 77 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://integranxt.com/sustainability, https://integranxt.com/press-releases, https://integranxt.com/case-studies, https://integranxt.com/webinars, https://integranxt.com/whitepapers and https://integranxt.com/ebooks and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 81 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed

  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed

  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    101 of 106 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 467 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 467 words of visible text.

5 checks passed

  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Schedule a Call”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Schedule a Call” and “Learn More”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 1 customer or partner logo and 8 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at integranxt.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 18 issues on integranxt.com, including 8 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25