Website review, no card needed
intenseoud.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202640 issues · 89 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on intenseoud.com, 16 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 11.3 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70C- #74,342 of 89,161 reviewed websitesbeats 14%
- #41,743 of 46,490 online storesbeats 8%
- #38,199 of 41,739 Shopify storesbeats 7%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 205 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 212 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 204 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.2 s
3.3 s
4.4 s
5.5 s
6.6 s
7.7 s
8.8 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 11.3 s
A phone's processor spends 11.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
1.0 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 32
32/100Your mobile performance score is 32. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,920 HTML elements
The page has 3,920 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (alia-prod.com, Google CDN and gotolstoy.com and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 553 KiBAbout 553 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 506 KiB28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (506 KiB).
alia-prod.com adds 644 ms
644 msalia-prod.com costs a phone 644 ms of main-thread work and 278 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
580 ms · 87 KiBAbout 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 580 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 550 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google CDN adds 202 ms
202 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 202 ms of main-thread work and 297 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
100 ms · 139 KiB9 images could be 139 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
23 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 18.4 s
18.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.7 s
6.7 sYour largest element takes 6.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 8.6 s
8.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 206 ms
206 msReal visitors wait 206 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.22
0.22For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.22 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.201
0.201The layout shifts by 0.201 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 205 ms to 204 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 733 ms
733 msReal visitors wait 733 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 61% faster for real visitors
-61%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.5 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 255 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 255 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (116), other files 659 KiB (78) and images 276 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.90 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.90 g of CO₂e: 108.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (20 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 60 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
54 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 54 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (273 characters)
Your meta description is 273 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
172 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 172 pages on intenseoud.com and 9 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Intense Oud”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Intense Oud | Niche Arabian Perfumes & Oud Fragrances in USA”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.intenseoud.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.intenseoud.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (948 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
/customer_authentication/redirect has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 104 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Best practices
45 small tap targets
45 of 91 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,502 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,502 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop The Scent” and “Shop The Show”.
14 calls to action
The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Join Intense Rewards”, “Shop the Scent” and “Shop the Show”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
26 cookies set on arrival
26Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
54 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 54 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at intenseoud.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 17 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Tolstoy · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Microsoft Clarity · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Eaze Button · Boost Ai Search Filter · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Rebuy Personalization Engine · Omnisend · Reviews Co Uk Product And Merchant Review Collection · Back In Stock · trafficmanager.net · goaffpro.com · ryviu.com · b-cdn.net · 9gtb.com · getredo.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Chicago
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on intenseoud.com, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.