Website review, no card needed
investors.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202660 issues · 103 checks
This review found 60 issues worth fixing on investors.com, 27 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 174 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 122 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
1.9 s
2.9 s
3.8 s
4.8 s
5.7 s
6.7 s
7.7 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.3 s · 3.9 MBAbout 3.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.5 s · 2.4 MB154 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.9 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.
Main-thread work: 18.5 s
A phone's processor spends 18.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 9.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 6
6/100Your mobile performance score is 6. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5,288 HTML elements
The page has 5,288 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, LiveRamp Privacy Manager and Rubicon Project and others), adding 3.4 MB and 3.4 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.0 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 681 ms
681 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 681 ms of main-thread work and 828 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
LiveRamp Privacy Manager adds 644 ms
644 msLiveRamp Privacy Manager costs a phone 644 ms of main-thread work and 123 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 468 ms
468 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 468 ms of main-thread work and 798 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
400 ms · 132 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 132 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
Rubicon Project adds 517 ms
517 msRubicon Project costs a phone 517 ms of main-thread work and 98 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
200 ms · 309 KiB11 images could be 309 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 320 ms
320 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 320 ms of main-thread work and 606 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
362 KiB362 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
79 KiBAbout 79 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify CSS
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 34 ms
34 msYour server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.52
0.52For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.52 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 11.4 s
11.4 sThe first text or image appears after 11.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.3 s
23.3 sYour largest element takes 23.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Wall Street "WALL ST" sign and broadway street over America…”.
Speed Index: 24.5 s
24.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 24.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 95.1 s
95.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 95.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.8 s
3.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.43
0.43The layout shifts by 0.43 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 150 ms
150 msReal visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 716 ms
716 msReal visitors wait 716 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 20% faster for real visitors
-20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 144 ms to 122 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.5 MB in 1,106 requests
12.5 MBYour homepage downloads 12.5 MB in 1,106 requests on a phone: scripts 8.4 MB (245), images 1.8 MB (289) and HTML 789 KiB (118). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images in older formats
7 images (290 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit
3.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.54 g of CO₂e: 424.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
12 text elements with low contrast
12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (1 element)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (132 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 132 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Tables do not use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption.
Tables do not use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption. (2 elements).
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Investor’s Business Daily | Stock News and Stock Market Analysis - IBD”.
15 links crawlers can't follow
15 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
210 internal links, 164 external
The homepage links to 210 pages on investors.com and 164 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “Perform stock investment research with our IBD research tools to help investment strategies. We provide the resources t…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Investor's Business Daily”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.investors.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.investors.com/sitemaps/web/ibd/en/sitemap_ibd_en_index.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 4 AI answer engine crawlers
4 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.investors.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers
robots.txt blocks ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
2 checks passed
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,496 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.investors.com/market-trend/ibds-etf-market-strategy/ibds-etf-market-strategy and https://www.investors.com/ibd-indexes/ibd-etf-indexes-ibd-50-etf-leaders-breakout-stocks-etf-ffty-ldrs-bout all use the title “IBD's ETF Market Strategy | Investor's Business Daily”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.investors.com/tag/all-news-and-stock-ideas has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.investors.com/market-trend/ibds-etf-market-strategy/ibds-etf-market-strategy and https://www.investors.com/ibd-indexes/ibd-etf-indexes-ibd-50-etf-leaders-breakout-stocks-etf-ffty-ldrs-bout use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.investors.com/stock-lists/best-growth-stocks-buy-watch-ibd-stock-lists, whose canonical is https://www.investors.com/research/best-growth-stocks-buy-watch-ibd-stock-lists. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.investors.com/tag/all-news-and-stock-ideas, https://www.investors.com/category/market-trend/the-big-picture, https://www.investors.com/category/stock-lists/stocks-near-a-buy-zone and https://www.investors.com/ibd-data-tables have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 87 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=4017980&Ver=2&mid=737229a8-0faf-41b5-a2bb-16883180f378&bo=1&sid=93a633e0d13811f194f3057cd1405c18&vid=93a665e0d13811f1930de91c5dbad330&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.
25 third-party cookies
25 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
5 small tap targets
5 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
6 distorted images
6 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
About 1,389 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,389 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
21 calls to action
The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “WSJ | Buy Side”, “Subscribe” and “New? Start Here”.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
14 trackers load before any consent
14Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 9 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
47 cookies set on arrival
47Opening the homepage sets 47 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
88 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 88 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at investors.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 60 issues on investors.com, including 26 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.