Website review, no card needed

invitae.com logo

invitae.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202635 issues · 77 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on invitae.com, 13 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.5 sMay 16Oct 311.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
151 ms107 msMay 16Oct 31112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026141 ms
May 23, 2026144 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026144 ms
Jun 13, 2026136 ms
Jun 20, 2026129 ms
Jun 27, 2026122 ms
Jul 4, 2026120 ms
Jul 11, 2026119 ms
Jul 18, 2026118 ms
Jul 25, 2026116 ms
Aug 1, 2026117 ms
Aug 8, 2026117 ms
Aug 15, 2026116 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026117 ms
Sep 5, 2026117 ms
Sep 12, 2026117 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026113 ms
Oct 3, 2026114 ms
Oct 10, 2026114 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026113 ms
Oct 31, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of invitae.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. invitae.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. invitae.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. invitae.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. invitae.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. invitae.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. invitae.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. invitae.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. invitae.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix29
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.4 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.5 s · 608 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (608 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 29

    29/100

    Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 100 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 100 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 400 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Google Tag Manager and Amplitude Mobile Analytics and others), adding 1.3 MB and 233 ms of main-thread time.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Optanon adds 102 ms

    102 ms

    Optanon costs a phone 102 ms of main-thread work and 427 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Amplitude Mobile Analytics adds 42 ms

    42 ms

    Amplitude Mobile Analytics costs a phone 42 ms of main-thread work and 486 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 64 KiB

    About 64 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    129 KiB

    3 images could be 129 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.8 s

    17.8 s

    Your largest element takes 17.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to enable certain functions and tools on thi…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.8 s

    17.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.315

    0.315

    The layout shifts by 0.315 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.12

    0.12

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 478 ms

    478 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 478 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 105 ms

    105 ms

    Real visitors wait 105 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 634 ms

    634 ms

    Real visitors wait 634 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 141 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors

    -27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

3 to fix69
  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 77 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 77 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (33), images 224 KiB (10) and other files 79 KiB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Invitae_Homepage_-_Hero_3780x1312.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    45 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Invitae_Homepage_-_Text___Media_3_3000x3000.png at 633 px wide, shown at 173 px. Resized copies would save about 45 KiB.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.77 g of CO₂e: 92.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9595
  • Images must have alternative text (2 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8594
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Expected property name or '}' in JSON at position 1 (line 1 )”.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 23 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 23 pages on invitae.com and 19 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Invitae and Labcorp together offer advanced genetic testing services that can be integrated into medical practices. Imp…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Bringing the future of genetic testing within reach”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Genetic testing services: DNA testing for better health”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.invitae.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.invitae.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.invitae.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (455 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/papers-and-presentations and https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/educational-webinars all use the title “Scientific Expertise | Labcorp”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/papers-and-presentations and https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/educational-webinars have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/test-catalog, whose canonical is https://www.invitae.com/providers/test-catalog. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/test-catalog has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/test-catalog, https://www.invitae.com/us/contact, https://www.invitae.com/providers/test-catalog/neurology and https://www.invitae.com/providers/test-catalog/genetic-risk have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/educational-webinars took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 472 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 472 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Get in touch”, “Learn more” and “contact page”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at invitae.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
AWS

Hiring

Hiring
3 open roles
Job board
careers page

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on invitae.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25