Website review, no card needed
invitae.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202635 issues · 77 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on invitae.com, 13 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 141 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 112 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.4 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.5 s · 608 KiB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (608 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 100 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 100 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 400 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Google Tag Manager and Amplitude Mobile Analytics and others), adding 1.3 MB and 233 ms of main-thread time.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
Optanon adds 102 ms
102 msOptanon costs a phone 102 ms of main-thread work and 427 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Amplitude Mobile Analytics adds 42 ms
42 msAmplitude Mobile Analytics costs a phone 42 ms of main-thread work and 486 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 64 KiBAbout 64 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
129 KiB3 images could be 129 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 7.8 s
7.8 sThe first text or image appears after 7.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.8 s
17.8 sYour largest element takes 17.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to enable certain functions and tools on thi…”.
Time to Interactive: 17.8 s
17.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.4 s
8.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.315
0.315The layout shifts by 0.315 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user CLS: 0.12
0.12For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 478 ms
478 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 478 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 105 ms
105 msReal visitors wait 105 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 634 ms
634 msReal visitors wait 634 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 21% faster for real visitors
-21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 141 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors
-27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.7 MB in 77 requests
2.7 MBYour homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 77 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (33), images 224 KiB (10) and other files 79 KiB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Invitae_Homepage_-_Hero_3780x1312.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images far larger than shown
45 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Invitae_Homepage_-_Text___Media_3_3000x3000.png at 633 px wide, shown at 173 px. Resized copies would save about 45 KiB.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.77 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.77 g of CO₂e: 92.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Expected property name or '}' in JSON at position 1 (line 1 )”.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
23 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 23 pages on invitae.com and 19 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Invitae and Labcorp together offer advanced genetic testing services that can be integrated into medical practices. Imp…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Bringing the future of genetic testing within reach”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Genetic testing services: DNA testing for better health”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.invitae.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.invitae.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.invitae.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (455 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/papers-and-presentations and https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/educational-webinars all use the title “Scientific Expertise | Labcorp”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/papers-and-presentations and https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/educational-webinars have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/test-catalog, whose canonical is https://www.invitae.com/providers/test-catalog. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/test-catalog has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages with very little text
https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/test-catalog, https://www.invitae.com/us/contact, https://www.invitae.com/providers/test-catalog/neurology and https://www.invitae.com/providers/test-catalog/genetic-risk have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/educational-webinars took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 472 words of copy
The homepage carries about 472 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Get in touch”, “Learn more” and “contact page”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at invitae.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- AWS
Hiring
- Hiring
- 3 open roles
- Job board
- careers page
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on invitae.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.