Website review, no card needed

invivox.com logo

invivox.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202652 issues · 90 checks

This review found 52 issues worth fixing on invivox.com, 23 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s2.4 sMay 2Oct 173.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
321 ms152 msMay 2Oct 17184 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026216 ms
May 9, 2026213 ms
May 16, 2026205 ms
May 23, 2026208 ms
May 30, 2026209 ms
Jun 6, 2026221 ms
Jun 13, 2026253 ms
Jun 20, 2026273 ms
Jun 27, 2026291 ms
Jul 4, 2026301 ms
Jul 11, 2026297 ms
Jul 18, 2026294 ms
Jul 25, 2026278 ms
Aug 1, 2026259 ms
Aug 8, 2026262 ms
Aug 15, 2026261 ms
Aug 22, 2026254 ms
Aug 29, 2026242 ms
Sep 5, 2026214 ms
Sep 12, 2026187 ms
Sep 19, 2026184 ms
Sep 26, 2026180 ms
Oct 3, 2026171 ms
Oct 10, 2026171 ms
Oct 17, 2026184 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of invivox.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. invivox.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  2. invivox.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  3. invivox.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  4. invivox.com at 8.7 s8.7 s
  5. invivox.com at 10.9 s10.9 s
  6. invivox.com at 13.1 s13.1 s
  7. invivox.com at 15.2 s15.2 s
  8. invivox.com at 17.4 s17.4 s

Speed

16 to fix30
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    16.6 s · 20.7 MB

    185 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (20.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    15.2 s · 19.8 MB

    83 images could be 19.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 15.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 575 KiB

    About 575 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 30

    30/100

    Your mobile performance score is 30 (desktop: 45). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, TikTok and Google Maps and others), adding 4.5 MB and 704 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    808 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 808 ms on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    800 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 800 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 93 KiB

    About 93 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 406 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 247 ms

    247 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • strapiapp.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    strapiapp.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • crisp.help adds 92 ms

    92 ms

    crisp.help costs a phone 92 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,843 HTML elements

    The page has 1,843 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Maps adds 133 ms

    133 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 133 ms of main-thread work and 328 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Server response: 908 ms

    908 ms

    Your server takes 908 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Real visitors wait 5.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 84.2 s

    84.2 s

    Your largest element takes 84.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 39.7 s

    39.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 39.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 89.2 s

    89.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 89.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.20

    0.20

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.235

    0.235

    The layout shifts by 0.235 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 558 ms

    558 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 558 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 180 ms

    180 ms

    Real visitors wait 180 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 216 ms to 184 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 26.7 MB in 300 requests

    26.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 26.7 MB in 300 requests on a phone: images 22.4 MB (139), fonts 2.2 MB (32) and scripts 1.6 MB (80). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images far larger than shown

    14.8 MB

    15 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 17913641666ac60c46b62174.22840508.png at 3,872 px wide, shown at 589 px. Resized copies would save about 14.8 MB.

  • 6 images over 500 KB

    6 images weigh 14.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 39 images in older formats

    39 images (19.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 36 images below the first screen load straight away

    36 images further down the page (18.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 7.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    7.56 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.56 g of CO₂e: 907.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8788
  • 10 buttons without a name

    10 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    106 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Links must have discernible text (14 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (4 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (18 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 145 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10079
  • Title is long (77 characters)

    Your title is 77 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Formation Médicale - Leader du partage de connaissances entre pairs – Invivox”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“L’échographie au cabinet : toutes les clés pour v…”, “Pédiatrie & Neurologie : Les essentiels cliniques…” and “Vos collègues partagent leur expertise”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (274 characters)

    Your meta description is 274 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 113 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 113 pages on invivox.com and 5 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://invivox.com/fr.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://invivox.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://invivox.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,173 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 15 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://invivox.com/fr/training/detail/BIOX86940/tdah-troubles-du-sommeil-l-usage-de-la-melatonine-en-pratique-cli, whose canonical is https://invivox.com/fr/training/detail/BIOX86940. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 10 pages slow to respond

    https://invivox.com/fr/training/detail/CREG16459/reflux-constipation-diversification-evaluez-votre-pratique-en-gas, https://invivox.com/fr/training/detail/INMG96014/prescription-des-antidepresseurs-en-pratique-clinique, https://invivox.com/fr/training/detail/SANV84797/prevention-vrs-2026-2027-les-recommandations-a-connaitre, https://invivox.com/fr/training/detail/IXDZ85506/tdah-en-medecine-generale-diagnostic-et-facteurs-de-risque, https://invivox.com/fr/training/detail/BIOX30413/tdah-chez-l-enfant-quelle-place-pour-les-traitements-pharmacologi and https://invivox.com/fr/training/detail/ECHO74212/echographie-au-cabinet-cout-formation-reglementaire-le-guide-pour and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    32 of 35 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 36 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 3,092 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 3,092 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at invivox.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

Framework
Angular
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 52 issues on invivox.com, including 28 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25