Website review, no card needed
isa.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202644 issues · 92 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on isa.org, 17 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 227 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
4.7 s · 1.3 MB9 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.5 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.5 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.9 s · 537 KiBAbout 537 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 26
26/100Your mobile performance score is 26 (desktop: 84). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and jQuery CDN and others), adding 1.1 MB and 700 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 566 ms
566 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 566 ms of main-thread work and 698 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 65 KiBAbout 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 63 KiB63 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
2,592 HTML elements
The page has 2,592 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 33 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (33 KiB).
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 183 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 31 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 84 but mobile only 26. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 612 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.2 s
5.2 sReal visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.70
0.70For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.70 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.5 s
15.5 sYour largest element takes 15.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s
6.5 sThe first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 15.5 s
15.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.636
0.636The layout shifts by 0.636 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 6.5 s
6.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 211 ms
211 msReal visitors wait 211 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 73% slower for real visitors
+73%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 227 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 5.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 417 ms
417 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 417 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 43 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 43 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (16), scripts 1.1 MB (14) and fonts 457 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
6 images in older formats
6 images (1.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images far larger than shown
125 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example ase-2026-expo-image.jpg at 808 px wide, shown at 262 px. Resized copies would save about 125 KiB.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.92 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 109.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
26 text elements with low contrast
26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings should not be empty (5 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 14 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
106 internal links, 43 external
The homepage links to 106 pages on isa.org and 43 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 83 characters
Your meta description is 83 characters: “Empowering the global automation community through standards and knowledge sharing.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Take Advantage of Cybersecurity Awareness Month”.
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “International Society of Automation (ISA)”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.isa.org/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.isa.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.isa.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 2 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (984 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages share a meta description
https://www.isa.org/membership/membership-renewal, https://www.isa.org/store, https://www.isa.org/terms-and-conditions and https://www.isa.org/standards-and-publications/isa-standards use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
31 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 888 words of copy
The homepage carries about 888 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop” and “Join”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Join”, “Shop” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at isa.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Hiring
- Hiring
- 8 open roles
- Teams
- Finance ISA (2), Special (2), Strategic (2), Innovative Signal Analysis (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- boards.greenhouse.io/isa (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Founded
- 1945
- Headquarters
- Durham
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on isa.org, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.