Website review, no card needed

iso-group.com logo

iso-group.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202640 issues · 90 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on iso-group.com, 15 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.5 sMay 2Oct 172.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
115 ms95 msMay 2Oct 17107 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026102 ms
May 9, 202697 ms
May 16, 202699 ms
May 23, 2026103 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 202699 ms
Jun 27, 2026100 ms
Jul 4, 2026101 ms
Jul 11, 2026103 ms
Jul 18, 2026104 ms
Jul 25, 2026104 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026108 ms
Aug 29, 2026112 ms
Sep 5, 2026112 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026113 ms
Sep 26, 2026110 ms
Oct 3, 2026109 ms
Oct 10, 2026107 ms
Oct 17, 2026107 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of iso-group.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. iso-group.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. iso-group.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. iso-group.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. iso-group.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. iso-group.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. iso-group.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. iso-group.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. iso-group.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

12 to fix43
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.1 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.4 s · 216 KiB

    About 216 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Google CDN costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 60). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.8 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 290 KiB

    4 images could be 290 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 176 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (176 KiB).

  • Minify CSS

    600 ms · 42 KiB

    42 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 322 ms

    322 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 322 ms of main-thread work and 331 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 17 KiB

    17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 232 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    56 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 56 ms

    56 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 56 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.5 s

    19.5 s

    Your largest element takes 19.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Dynatech International Acquires ISO Group.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.9 s

    24.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 476 ms

    476 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 476 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 107 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 127 ms

    127 ms

    Real visitors wait 127 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 75 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 75 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (21), images 1.1 MB (24) and other files 759 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    105 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example DTech-Announcement.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 105 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (356 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (248 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.42 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.42 g of CO₂e: 170.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 18 text elements with low contrast

    18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 form fields without a label

    14 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10092
  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 155 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 155 pages on iso-group.com and 6 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “Supply chain partner for the defense and aerospace industry delivering quality solutions to enhance operational readine…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Start Your WEBFLIS, NSN, PART NUMBER Search”.

  • Title: 42 characters

    Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Defense and Aerospace Supply Chain Partner”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.iso-group.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.iso-group.com/10000i.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix65
  • robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler

    1 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.iso-group.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (895 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix75
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.iso-group.com/blog/current-openings is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.iso-group.com/webflis-nsn-search all use the title “Defense and Aerospace Supply Chain Partner”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://www.iso-group.com/blog/current-openings, https://www.iso-group.com/fsg, https://www.iso-group.com/category and https://www.iso-group.com/webflis-nsn-search have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.iso-group.com/information/fsc, whose canonical is https://www.iso-group.com/Information/FSC. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 123 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 8893
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot use import statement outside a module”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    22 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • A 12-field form

    Your longest form asks for 12 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 620 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 620 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Login/Register” and “Contact”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Login/Register”, “Contact” and “Request a Quote for Parts”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges and “more than 1,300 clients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at iso-group.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on iso-group.com, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25