Website review, no card needed

jacomar.com.br logo

jacomar.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202642 issues · 85 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on jacomar.com.br, 21 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
253 ms185 msMay 9Oct 24227 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026203 ms
May 16, 2026200 ms
May 23, 2026198 ms
May 30, 2026196 ms
Jun 6, 2026193 ms
Jun 13, 2026195 ms
Jun 20, 2026196 ms
Jun 27, 2026196 ms
Jul 4, 2026205 ms
Jul 11, 2026212 ms
Jul 18, 2026223 ms
Jul 25, 2026237 ms
Aug 1, 2026245 ms
Aug 8, 2026238 ms
Aug 15, 2026233 ms
Aug 22, 2026231 ms
Aug 29, 2026227 ms
Sep 5, 2026223 ms
Sep 12, 2026213 ms
Sep 19, 2026206 ms
Sep 26, 2026206 ms
Oct 3, 2026210 ms
Oct 10, 2026213 ms
Oct 17, 2026221 ms
Oct 24, 2026227 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jacomar.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jacomar.com.br at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. jacomar.com.br at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. jacomar.com.br at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. jacomar.com.br at 3.0 s3.0 s
  5. jacomar.com.br at 3.8 s3.8 s
  6. jacomar.com.br at 4.5 s4.5 s
  7. jacomar.com.br at 5.3 s5.3 s
  8. jacomar.com.br at 6.1 s6.1 s

Speed

7 to fix39
  • Improve image delivery

    4.5 s · 3.3 MB

    21 images could be 3.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • Font display

    1.0 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.0 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 43). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    630 ms · 386 KiB

    About 386 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 630 ms faster on a phone.

  • ZenDesk adds 245 ms

    245 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 245 ms of main-thread work and 413 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • FontAwesome CDN adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    FontAwesome CDN costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 303 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (ZenDesk, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics and others), adding 974 KiB and 368 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    160 ms · 27 KiB

    About 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 117 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    22 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (22 KiB).

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 534 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.38

    0.38

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.38 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    Your largest element takes 10.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Campanha RH Atração Mini 1”.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.0 s

    20.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.638

    0.638

    The layout shifts by 0.638 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 56 images without width and height

    56 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 203 ms to 227 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Real visitors wait 102 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 615 ms

    615 ms

    Real visitors wait 615 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 77 ms

    77 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 77 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 5.2 MB in 106 requests

    5.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 106 requests on a phone: images 3.8 MB (41), scripts 790 KiB (31) and fonts 546 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images far larger than shown

    2.1 MB

    9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example original_907327273e9e21c11013931e815a7c9862773d.png at 2,750 px wide, shown at 281 px. Resized copies would save about 2.1 MB.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (3.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.48 g of CO₂e: 178.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8290
  • 5 buttons without a name

    5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9177
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at jacomar.com.br/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 10 links crawlers can't follow

    10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 31 internal links, 87 external

    The homepage links to 31 pages on jacomar.com.br and 87 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “Há 60 anos, o Jacomar oferece qualidade, economia e respeito em Curitiba e Região Metropolitana, com lojas, ofertas, Cl…”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Supermercado Jacomar | Nossa Maior Oferta é o Respeito”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jacomar.com.br/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.jacomar.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (623 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 8 pages without a title

    https://www.jacomar.com.br/lojas, https://www.jacomar.com.br/sobre, https://www.jacomar.com.br/contato, https://www.jacomar.com.br/trabalhe, https://www.jacomar.com.br/blog/jacomar-60-anos-essa-historia-a-gente-conta-juntos and https://www.jacomar.com.br/blog and 2 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.jacomar.com.br/home all use the title “Supermercado Jacomar | Nossa Maior Oferta é o Respeito”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://www.jacomar.com.br/lojas, https://www.jacomar.com.br/sobre, https://www.jacomar.com.br/blog/categoria/imprensa, https://www.jacomar.com.br/contato, https://www.jacomar.com.br/trabalhe and https://www.jacomar.com.br/blog/jacomar-60-anos-essa-historia-a-gente-conta-juntos and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.jacomar.com.br/home and https://www.jacomar.com.br/ofertas have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.

  • 6 low-resolution images

    6 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    25 of 29 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 465 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 465 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jacomar.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Servicos de Internet Ltda

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on jacomar.com.br, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25