Website review, no card needed

jase.com logo

jase.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202646 issues · 91 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on jase.com, 18 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.7 sMay 16Oct 311.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
150 ms107 msMay 16Oct 31138 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026124 ms
Jun 20, 2026125 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 4, 2026129 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026129 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms
Aug 1, 2026129 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026129 ms
Aug 29, 2026128 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026124 ms
Sep 19, 2026125 ms
Sep 26, 2026128 ms
Oct 3, 2026130 ms
Oct 10, 2026137 ms
Oct 17, 2026142 ms
Oct 24, 2026145 ms
Oct 31, 2026138 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jase.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jase.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. jase.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. jase.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. jase.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  5. jase.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  6. jase.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  7. jase.com at 6.1 s6.1 s
  8. jase.com at 6.9 s6.9 s

Speed

14 to fix38
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.6 s · 950 KiB

    About 950 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 s · 388 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (388 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 10.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5,569 HTML elements

    The page has 5,569 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, preproduct.io and figpii.com and others), adding 2.3 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    500 ms · 570 KiB

    12 images could be 570 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Shopify adds 698 ms

    698 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 698 ms of main-thread work and 970 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • preproduct.io adds 641 ms

    641 ms

    preproduct.io costs a phone 641 ms of main-thread work and 44 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • figpii.com adds 527 ms

    527 ms

    figpii.com costs a phone 527 ms of main-thread work and 376 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 271 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • ZenDesk adds 224 ms

    224 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 224 ms of main-thread work and 431 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • cloudfront.net adds 135 ms

    135 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 135 ms of main-thread work and 296 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    100 ms · 36 KiB

    About 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 49 ms

    49 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 49 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.0 s

    22.0 s

    Your largest element takes 22.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.9 s

    25.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors

    +26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 138 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 146 ms

    146 ms

    Real visitors wait 146 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 651 ms

    651 ms

    Real visitors wait 651 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.026

    0.026

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.026, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

6 to fix29
  • Page weight: 5.3 MB in 460 requests

    5.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 460 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (132), other files 1.3 MB (230) and images 1.2 MB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    usecase-uti-image.webp weighs 498 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    bunker-box-mobile.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (809 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    260 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Outdoor-Innovation-Awards-2025-Jase_1.png at 1,512 px wide, shown at 87 px. Resized copies would save about 260 KiB.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.51 g of CO₂e: 181.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 10091
  • 54 text elements with low contrast

    54 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (6 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (5 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9281
  • Title is short (19 characters)

    Your title is only 19 characters: “Jase – Jase Medical”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 9 H1 headlines

    There are 9 <h1> headlines (“”, “JaseCase” and “From $239.95 USD”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (229 characters)

    Your meta description is 229 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 112 internal links, 35 external

    The homepage links to 112 pages on jase.com and 35 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://jase.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jase.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,759 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://jase.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7776
  • 3 broken images

    3 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://variations-cdn.figpii.com/variations/external-asset/jase/R_HP_Improve_Hero/src/MobileAndDesktopOnly/V1/assets/01_preppers_mobile.jpg?v=1791834225063.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Shopify is not defined”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    28 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,397 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,397 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

5 checks passed
  • 22 calls to action

    The homepage has 22 calls to action, for example “View Order History”, “Contact Us” and “Order Chronic Meds”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 61 testimonial or review blocks, 3 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 38 cookies set on arrival

    38

    Opening the homepage sets 38 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 67 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 67 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jase.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Globo Mega Menu · Figpii Ab Testing Replays · Preproduct Pre Order · Attentive · Microsoft Clarity · Triplewhale · Mntn · Judge Me Reviews · Rivo Loyalty Rewards Referrals · govx.com · attn.tv

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on jase.com, including 24 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25