Website review, no card needed

jbu.edu logo

jbu.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202638 issues · 90 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on jbu.edu, 10 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.4 sMay 16Oct 311.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Oct 31, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
134 ms117 msMay 16Oct 31120 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026119 ms
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026121 ms
Jun 6, 2026128 ms
Jun 13, 2026131 ms
Jun 20, 2026132 ms
Jun 27, 2026131 ms
Jul 4, 2026122 ms
Jul 11, 2026120 ms
Jul 18, 2026121 ms
Jul 25, 2026124 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026131 ms
Aug 15, 2026130 ms
Aug 22, 2026126 ms
Aug 29, 2026124 ms
Sep 5, 2026121 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026121 ms
Sep 26, 2026121 ms
Oct 3, 2026126 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026121 ms
Oct 24, 2026122 ms
Oct 31, 2026120 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jbu.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jbu.edu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jbu.edu at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. jbu.edu at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. jbu.edu at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. jbu.edu at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. jbu.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. jbu.edu at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. jbu.edu at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

10 to fix52
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 369 KiB

    62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (369 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 278 KiB

    About 278 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (FontAwesome CDN, technolutions.net and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 736 KiB

    7 images could be 736 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • FontAwesome CDN adds 459 ms

    459 ms

    FontAwesome CDN costs a phone 459 ms of main-thread work and 163 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • technolutions.net adds 366 ms

    366 ms

    technolutions.net costs a phone 366 ms of main-thread work and 273 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,822 HTML elements

    The page has 2,822 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 194 KiB

    About 194 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 209 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    14 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 19 ms

    19 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.4 s

    13.4 s

    Your largest element takes 13.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.3 s

    14.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 479 ms

    479 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 479 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 29 images without width and height

    29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 184 ms

    184 ms

    Real visitors wait 184 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 627 ms

    627 ms

    Real visitors wait 627 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix57
  • 4 images far larger than shown

    559 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20261024_sm1_TP_GAME-22.jpg at 2,000 px wide, shown at 292 px. Resized copies would save about 559 KiB.

  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 115 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 115 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (23), scripts 966 KiB (37) and fonts 236 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Homepage_Quad.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (725 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.80 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.80 g of CO₂e: 96.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9393
  • 19 text elements with low contrast

    19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8585
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“A Premier Christian University in Northwest Arkan…”, “A Premier Christian University in Northwest Arkan…” and “A Premier Christian University in Northwest Arkan…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 26 links with vague text

    26 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 109 internal links, 23 external

    The homepage links to 109 pages on jbu.edu and 23 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Discover John Brown University in Arkansas: A top Christian institution offering bachelor's and master's degrees with a…”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “John Brown University: A Christian College in Northwest Arkansas”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.jbu.edu/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jbu.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.jbu.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,627 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix62
  • 2 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.jbu.edu/applicant-portal and https://www.jbu.edu/es/visit/old, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.jbu.edu/admissions/apply and https://www.jbu.edu/apply all use the title “Apply for Admission at John Brown University”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.jbu.edu/admissions/apply and https://www.jbu.edu/apply use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.jbu.edu/apply, whose canonical is https://www.jbu.edu/admissions/apply. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 76 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://assets.calendly.com/assets/external/widget.css' from origin 'https://www.jbu.edu' …”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: “more than 2,200 students”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,085 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,085 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start your application”.

  • 28 calls to action

    The homepage has 28 calls to action, for example “Apply Now”, “Request Info” and “Start your application”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jbu.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
HubSpot CMS
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
HubSpot

Company

Employees
418
Founded
1919
Headquarters
Siloam Springs

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on jbu.edu, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25