Website review, no card needed
jectnyc.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202647 issues · 90 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on jectnyc.com, 19 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 146 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.8 s · 8.8 MB15 images could be 8.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.5 s · 1.7 MB89 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.5 s · 752 KiBAbout 752 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
audioeye-services.com adds 1.5 s
1.5 saudioeye-services.com costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 297 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 44
44/100Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.2 s
A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (audioeye-services.com, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 2.1 MB and 2.7 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 603 ms
603 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 603 ms of main-thread work and 955 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 332 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 22 KiBAbout 22 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Hubspot adds 241 ms
241 msHubspot costs a phone 241 ms of main-thread work and 354 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,043 HTML elements
The page has 2,043 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 43 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 38 ms
38 msYour server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 53.5 s
53.5 sYour largest element takes 53.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Medical Aesthetics Made Modern HP”.
Speed Index: 26.7 s
26.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 26.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 55.7 s
55.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 55.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 869 ms
869 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 869 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.12
0.12For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 146 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 911 ms
911 msReal visitors wait 911 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 165 ms
165 msReal visitors wait 165 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 103.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
10 images far larger than shown
100.7 MB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 260317_CodyLidtke_JECT_Capture_0458.jpg at 5,433 px wide, shown at 374 px. Resized copies would save about 100.7 MB.
Page weight: 14.2 MB in 196 requests
14.2 MBYour homepage downloads 14.2 MB in 196 requests on a phone: images 9.2 MB (51), other files 2.4 MB (61) and scripts 2.1 MB (48). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images in older formats
4 images (97.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
14 images below the first screen load straight away
14 images further down the page (74.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Group 18-1.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit
4.02 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.02 g of CO₂e: 482.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
60 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
15 links without text
15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names. (1 element).
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 62 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
54 links with vague text
54 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Medical Aesthetics Made Modern” and “Introducing JECT Rewards”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (180 characters)
Your meta description is 180 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
207 internal links, 70 external
The homepage links to 207 pages on jectnyc.com and 70 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “JECT | Medical Aesthetics in NYC, LA & Miami”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ject.us/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ject.us/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://ject.us/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,273 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://ject.us/rewards has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://ject.us/rewards has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 91 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'designMode')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
35 of 40 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 8 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,996 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,996 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More” and “Shop”.
39 calls to action
The homepage has 39 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Shop” and “Schedule Consult”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
37 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jectnyc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- HubSpot CMS
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- HubSpot
Hiring
- Hiring
- 2 open roles
- Job board
- jazzhr
- Careers page
- ject.us/careers (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Headquarters
- New York
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on jectnyc.com, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.