Website review, no card needed
jetro.go.jp website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202647 issues · 88 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on jetro.go.jp, 15 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 168 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.1 s
1.6 s
2.1 s
2.7 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
4.3 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 2.3 MB133 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.3 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.2 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 239 KiBAbout 239 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (bizris.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
900 ms · 316 KiBAbout 316 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 673 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
bizris.com adds 515 ms
515 msbizris.com costs a phone 515 ms of main-thread work and 211 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 330 KiB12 images could be 330 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 364 ms
364 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 364 ms of main-thread work and 378 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Fonts adds 4 ms
4 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 4 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 35 KiB35 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 259 ms
259 msYour server sent the HTML in 259 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.0 s
15.0 sYour largest element takes 15.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 15.3 s
15.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.8 s
7.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
35 images without width and height
35 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 269 ms
269 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 269 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.109
0.109The layout shifts by 0.109 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 168 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 143 ms
143 msReal visitors wait 143 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 407 ms
407 msReal visitors wait 407 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.0 MB in 210 requests
4.0 MBYour homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 210 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (112), scripts 972 KiB (19) and fonts 956 KiB (44). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (442 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
6 images in older formats
6 images (378 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.14 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.14 g of CO₂e: 137.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (7 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (7 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 74 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “ジェトロ(日本貿易振興機構) | ジェトロ”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
252 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 252 pages on jetro.go.jp and 7 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 103 characters
Your meta description is 103 characters: “ジェトロは2003年に設立されました独立行政法人です。 海外74カ所、国内48カ所のネットワークをフルに活用し、海外ビジネス情報の提供、中堅・中小企業等の海外展開支援、対日投資の促進などに取り組んでいます。”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.jetro.go.jp/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jetro.go.jp/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.jetro.go.jp/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
9 pages without a meta description
https://www.jetro.go.jp/contact, https://www.jetro.go.jp/world/reports, https://www.jetro.go.jp/tv, https://www.jetro.go.jp/world/gtir, https://www.jetro.go.jp/world/gtirs.html and https://www.jetro.go.jp/biz/trendreports and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.jetro.go.jp/world/gtirs.html, whose canonical is https://www.jetro.go.jp/world/gtirs. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.jetro.go.jp/en has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
11 pages with very little text
https://www.jetro.go.jp/jetro, https://www.jetro.go.jp/contact, https://www.jetro.go.jp/biznews, https://www.jetro.go.jp/biz/areareports, https://www.jetro.go.jp/world/reports and https://www.jetro.go.jp/tv and 5 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 194 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
16 small tap targets
16 of 60 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 503 ()”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 53 words
The homepage has only about 53 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jetro.go.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Company
- Founded
- 1958
- Headquarters
- Osaka
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on jetro.go.jp, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.