Website review, no card needed

jfsannarbor.org logo

jfsannarbor.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202649 issues · 111 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on jfsannarbor.org, 14 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.6 s
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
107 ms80 msMay 2Oct 17104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202693 ms
May 9, 202692 ms
May 16, 202693 ms
May 23, 202686 ms
May 30, 202686 ms
Jun 6, 202684 ms
Jun 13, 202683 ms
Jun 20, 202685 ms
Jun 27, 202686 ms
Jul 4, 202688 ms
Jul 11, 202689 ms
Jul 18, 202699 ms
Jul 25, 202699 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 202694 ms
Aug 15, 202697 ms
Aug 22, 202691 ms
Aug 29, 202686 ms
Sep 5, 202692 ms
Sep 12, 202692 ms
Sep 19, 202694 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

13 to fix45
  • Improve image delivery

    14.8 s · 3.7 MB

    18 images could be 3.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (tockify.com, Weebly and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.3 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 949 KiB

    About 949 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 325 KiB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (325 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • tockify.com adds 703 ms

    703 ms

    tockify.com costs a phone 703 ms of main-thread work and 358 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Weebly adds 641 ms

    641 ms

    Weebly costs a phone 641 ms of main-thread work and 538 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 383 ms

    383 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 383 ms of main-thread work and 344 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Maps adds 293 ms

    293 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 293 ms of main-thread work and 545 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 294 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google CDN adds 95 ms

    95 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 95 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    61 KiB

    About 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.7 s

    22.7 s

    Your largest element takes 22.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Creating Solutions. Inspiring Humanity. ​Promoting Dignity.…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.5 s

    31.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 867 ms

    867 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 867 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 15 images without width and height

    15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 106 ms

    106 ms

    Real visitors wait 106 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 561 ms

    561 ms

    Real visitors wait 561 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.07

    0.07

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.07, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix28
  • Page weight: 7.7 MB in 115 requests

    7.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.7 MB in 115 requests on a phone: images 5.2 MB (30), scripts 2.0 MB (39) and fonts 306 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (4.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 10 images below the first screen load straight away

    10 images further down the page (3.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    149 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example whats-happening-2_orig.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 355 px. Resized copies would save about 149 KiB.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.18 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.18 g of CO₂e: 261.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8189
  • Links must have discernible text (4 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 4 images without alt text

    4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (27 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 27 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7573
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (23 characters)

    Your meta description is only 23 characters: “JFS of Washtenaw County”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 9 links crawlers can't follow

    9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 108 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 108 pages on jfsannarbor.org and 9 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 30 characters

    Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “JFS of Washtenaw County - Home”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jfsannarbor.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (369 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 10 pages without a meta description

    /services.html, /wise-safety-net.html, /wise-senior-center.html, /cares.html, /support-groups.html and /wise-choice.html and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /services.html, /wise.html, /wise-safety-net.html, /wise-senior-center.html, /cares.html and /support-groups.html and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix79
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://jfsannarbor.org does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (jfsannarbor.org).

  • Valid certificate (47 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for jfsannarbor.org and is valid for another 47 days.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 48 links work

    All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    jfsannarbor.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    jfsannarbor.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 22 years old

    22 years

    jfsannarbor.org was registered in Apr 2004 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2028

    jfsannarbor.org is registered until Apr 2028.

Content and conversion

3 to fix85
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 172 words

    The homepage has only about 172 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “CONTACT”, “SUBSCRIBE” and “Subscribe”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be jfsannarbor.org is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:74.94.238.130 include:spf.constantcontact.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:akaraisin.com a:jfs…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “default” and “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It loads jQuery 1.8.3, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Headquarters
Ann Arbor

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on jfsannarbor.org, including 19 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25