Website review, no card needed

jhm.fr logo

jhm.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202637 issues · 79 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on jhm.fr, 11 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.1 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
175 ms146 msMay 9Oct 24172 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026170 ms
May 16, 2026165 ms
May 23, 2026162 ms
May 30, 2026160 ms
Jun 6, 2026158 ms
Jun 13, 2026160 ms
Jun 20, 2026160 ms
Jun 27, 2026162 ms
Jul 4, 2026166 ms
Jul 11, 2026160 ms
Jul 18, 2026155 ms
Jul 25, 2026150 ms
Aug 1, 2026149 ms
Aug 8, 2026155 ms
Aug 15, 2026162 ms
Aug 22, 2026167 ms
Aug 29, 2026164 ms
Sep 5, 2026164 ms
Sep 12, 2026166 ms
Sep 19, 2026167 ms
Sep 26, 2026167 ms
Oct 3, 2026162 ms
Oct 10, 2026164 ms
Oct 17, 2026168 ms
Oct 24, 2026172 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jhm.fr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jhm.fr at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jhm.fr at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. jhm.fr at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. jhm.fr at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. jhm.fr at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. jhm.fr at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. jhm.fr at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. jhm.fr at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

9 to fix66
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.0 s

    28 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 207 KiB

    About 207 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    758 KiB

    About 758 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Google Maps and others), adding 1.6 MB and 581 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    376 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (376 KiB).

  • Google CDN adds 284 ms

    284 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 284 ms of main-thread work and 741 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,700 HTML elements

    The page has 2,700 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Maps adds 119 ms

    119 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 119 ms of main-thread work and 393 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 87 KiB

    1 image could be 87 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 146 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 976 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 102 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Your largest element takes 5.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “A5 : sur le chantier géant d’APRR qui se clôt avec une sema…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 210 ms

    210 ms

    Real visitors wait 210 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 172 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 143 ms

    143 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 143 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.0 MB in 103 requests

    3.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 103 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (44), images 484 KiB (20) and other files 357 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (210 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.86 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.86 g of CO₂e: 103.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7990
  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 27 text elements with low contrast

    27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 20 links without text

    20 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8595
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 528 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 528 pages on jhm.fr and 5 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 134 characters

    Your meta description is 134 characters: “Restez informé de l'actualité en Haute-Marne, dans votre département, avec jhm, le média de référence. Toutes les infos…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Le Journal de la Haute-Marne”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “jhm | L'actualité en Haute-Marne, dans votre département”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://jhm.fr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: NewsMediaOrganization, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jhm.fr/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://jhm.fr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,403 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 192 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7791
  • 324 small tap targets

    324 of 377 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 268 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,821 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,821 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jhm.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
OVHcloud

Company

Founded
1944

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on jhm.fr, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25