Website review, no card needed
jmband.fr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202638 issues · 90 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on jmband.fr, 17 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #42,896 of 108,174 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #28,503 of 61,318 online storesbeats 47%
- #27,436 of 55,951 Shopify storesbeats 44%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 160 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
4.1 s
8.2 s
12.4 s
16.5 s
20.6 s
24.7 s
28.8 s
32.9 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 438 KiBAbout 438 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,253 HTML elements
The page has 3,253 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
1.7 MB4 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Mobile performance score: 65
65/100Your mobile performance score is 65. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (zakeke.com, Klaviyo and stape.net and others), adding 1.3 MB and 796 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
700 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.
zakeke.com adds 268 ms
268 mszakeke.com costs a phone 268 ms of main-thread work and 16 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 207 ms
207 msKlaviyo costs a phone 207 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 113 ms
113 msShopify costs a phone 113 ms of main-thread work and 651 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 156 KiB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (156 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 11 KiBAbout 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 122 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
31 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 73 ms
73 msYour server sent the HTML in 73 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 26.5 s
26.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 26.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.9 s
6.9 sYour largest element takes 6.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Nous et nos partenaires, y compris Shopify, utilisons des c…”.
Time to Interactive: 14.2 s
14.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 134 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user INP: 160 ms
160 msReal visitors wait 160 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 556 ms
556 msReal visitors wait 556 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 41% faster for real visitors
-41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 111 ms
111 msScripts block the page for only 111 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 445 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 445 requests on a phone: images 2.0 MB (25), other files 1.4 MB (248) and scripts 1.2 MB (115). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
6c6382f0-e39c-4b2c-ba15-674469521f32.png weighs 1.7 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image in older formats
1 image (1.7 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.44 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.44 g of CO₂e: 172.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
85 text elements with low contrast
85 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
46 images without alt text
46 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
56 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 64 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 56 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (71 characters)
Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “JM Band | +5500 produits imprimés personnalisés & livraison quotidienne”.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
413 internal links, 44 external
The homepage links to 413 pages on jmband.fr and 44 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 153 characters
Your meta description is 153 characters: “Plus de 30 000 clients satisfaits pour divers bracelets, billets à roulettes, billets de garde-robe, jetons, lanières e…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://jmband.fr/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: OnlineStore, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jmband.fr/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,649 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://jmband.fr/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://jmband.fr/collections/bracelets-rfid/Stofarmb%C3%A5nd, whose canonical is https://jmband.fr/collections/bracelets-rfid/stofarmb%c3%a5nd. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
https://jmband.fr/pages/livraison, https://jmband.fr/collections/bracelet-personnalise, https://jmband.fr/collections/bracelets-en-papier, https://jmband.fr/products/bracelets-en-papier-avec-imprime, https://jmband.fr/products/bracelets-en-papier-sans-imprimer and https://jmband.fr/products/bracelet-couleur and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 176 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
33 of 35 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,272 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,272 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks, 1 customer or partner logo, a star rating and 9 trust badges.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
40 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jmband.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Judge Me Reviews · Sc Easy Redirects · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Profitmetrics · Forms · Pdf Invoice Customizer · zakeke.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on jmband.fr, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.