Website review, no card needed

jmsearch.com logo

jmsearch.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202629 issues · 76 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on jmsearch.com, 9 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
7.0 s1.5 sMay 16Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20264.4 s
Sep 5, 20266.3 s
Sep 12, 20266.4 s
Sep 19, 20266.2 s
Sep 26, 20264.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
157 ms69 msMay 16Oct 3195 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202691 ms
May 30, 202687 ms
Jun 6, 202686 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202693 ms
Jul 4, 202689 ms
Jul 11, 202689 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202686 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 2026137 ms
Sep 12, 2026147 ms
Sep 19, 2026145 ms
Sep 26, 2026121 ms
Oct 3, 2026100 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms
Oct 31, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jmsearch.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jmsearch.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jmsearch.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. jmsearch.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. jmsearch.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. jmsearch.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. jmsearch.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. jmsearch.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. jmsearch.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix71
  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    850 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 850 ms.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (cloudfront.net and Adobe TypeKit), adding 2.7 MB and 340 ms of main-thread time.

  • cloudfront.net adds 340 ms

    340 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 340 ms of main-thread work and 2.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Document request latency

    396 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    191 KiB

    About 191 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    182 KiB

    About 182 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 65 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 414 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 95 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The leading retained executive search firm for private equi…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 91 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 101 ms

    101 ms

    Real visitors wait 101 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 8 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 81 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 81 requests on a phone: media 2.0 MB (1), HTML 592 KiB (1) and scripts 491 KiB (65). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.97 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.97 g of CO₂e: 116.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8791
  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 9 images without alt text

    9 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8591
  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, NewsArticle, Organization and WebPage) but with 2 problems, for example “NewsArticle: missing datePublished”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 97 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 97 pages on jmsearch.com and 6 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “JM Search is the premier retained executive search firm for private equity firms, venture capital firms, portfolio comp…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “One firm, focused on you.®”.

  • Title: 42 characters

    Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “JM Search | Recruiting Exceptional Leaders”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://jmsearch.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jmsearch.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://jmsearch.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (609 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://jmsearch.com/organization_category/private and https://jmsearch.com/organization_category/public have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://jmsearch.com/organization_category/private-equity-executive-search, whose canonical is https://jmsearch.com/organization/private-equity-executive-search. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    https://jmsearch.com/organization_category/private-equity-executive-search, https://jmsearch.com/organization_category/private, https://jmsearch.com/organization_category/public, https://jmsearch.com/functional_role/board, https://jmsearch.com/functional_role/ceo and https://jmsearch.com/functional_role/finance-accounting took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 43 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 443 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 443 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Contact Us” and “Download Now”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jmsearch.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
PrivateSystems Networks

Hiring

Hiring
2 open roles
Job board
paylocity

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on jmsearch.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25