Website review, no card needed
joveo.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202643 issues · 85 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on joveo.com, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 240 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 239 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 229 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 199 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.5 s · 873 KiBAbout 873 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.8 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 295 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (295 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 242 KiBAbout 242 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 2.1 MB15 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 74). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and getbreakout.ai and others), adding 1.9 MB and 638 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 325 ms
325 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 325 ms of main-thread work and 708 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,474 HTML elements
The page has 2,474 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
getbreakout.ai adds 55 ms
55 msgetbreakout.ai costs a phone 55 ms of main-thread work and 667 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 19 ms
19 msYour server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 37.6 s
37.6 sYour largest element takes 37.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Orchestrate intelligent agents to run end-to-end recruiting…”.
Time to Interactive: 39.4 s
39.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 39.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s
7.0 sThe first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.5 s
11.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 202 ms
202 msReal visitors wait 202 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 290 ms
290 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 290 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 240 ms to 199 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors
-21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.6 MB in 183 requests
9.6 MBYour homepage downloads 9.6 MB in 183 requests on a phone: images 7.2 MB (91), scripts 1.9 MB (44) and stylesheets 203 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images over 500 KB
5 images weigh 3.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images far larger than shown
641 KiB8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Attract-more-qualified-candidates-home.png at 1,520 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 641 KiB.
20 images below the first screen load straight away
20 images further down the page (2.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit
2.73 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.73 g of CO₂e: 327.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
12 tap targets too small
12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (35 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
221 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 221 pages on joveo.com and 8 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 134 characters
Your meta description is 134 characters: “Orchestrate AI agents to run end-to-end recruiting workflows. Drive more qualified applicants, faster hires, and unmatc…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Be the Agentic”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Agentic Recruiting Platform | The #1 AI Platform for Hiring”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.joveo.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.joveo.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,774 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.joveo.com/llms.txt (15 KiB, 63 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.joveo.com/ai-interview-scheduling is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
6 pages without a meta description
https://www.joveo.com/agentic-recruiting-platform, https://www.joveo.com/talent-crm-candidate-relationship-management-engagement-platform, https://www.joveo.com/direct-employers, https://www.joveo.com/staffing-agency-partnerships, https://www.joveo.com/recruitment-process-outsourcing and https://www.joveo.com/recruitment-marketing-agencies have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 77 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 distorted images
3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
39 of 39 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,071 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,071 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Get a Demo”, “Learn More” and “How does pricing work for Joveo?”.
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 18 customer or partner logos and 16 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at joveo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 28
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on joveo.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.