Website review, no card needed

joveo.com logo

joveo.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202643 issues · 85 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on joveo.com, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s2.2 sMay 9Oct 242.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.5 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
249 ms172 msMay 9Oct 24199 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026240 ms
May 16, 2026239 ms
May 23, 2026229 ms
May 30, 2026227 ms
Jun 6, 2026236 ms
Jun 13, 2026237 ms
Jun 20, 2026238 ms
Jun 27, 2026236 ms
Jul 4, 2026235 ms
Jul 11, 2026237 ms
Jul 18, 2026230 ms
Jul 25, 2026240 ms
Aug 1, 2026229 ms
Aug 8, 2026216 ms
Aug 15, 2026214 ms
Aug 22, 2026211 ms
Aug 29, 2026202 ms
Sep 5, 2026195 ms
Sep 12, 2026188 ms
Sep 19, 2026184 ms
Sep 26, 2026181 ms
Oct 3, 2026193 ms
Oct 10, 2026198 ms
Oct 17, 2026200 ms
Oct 24, 2026199 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of joveo.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. joveo.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. joveo.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. joveo.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. joveo.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  5. joveo.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  6. joveo.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  7. joveo.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  8. joveo.com at 6.0 s6.0 s

Speed

11 to fix50
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.5 s · 873 KiB

    About 873 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.8 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 295 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (295 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 242 KiB

    About 242 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 2.1 MB

    15 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 50

    50/100

    Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 74). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and getbreakout.ai and others), adding 1.9 MB and 638 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 325 ms

    325 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 325 ms of main-thread work and 708 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,474 HTML elements

    The page has 2,474 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • getbreakout.ai adds 55 ms

    55 ms

    getbreakout.ai costs a phone 55 ms of main-thread work and 667 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 42 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 19 ms

    19 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 37.6 s

    37.6 s

    Your largest element takes 37.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Orchestrate intelligent agents to run end-to-end recruiting…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.4 s

    39.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 202 ms

    202 ms

    Real visitors wait 202 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 290 ms

    290 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 290 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 20 images without width and height

    20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 240 ms to 199 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix28
  • Page weight: 9.6 MB in 183 requests

    9.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.6 MB in 183 requests on a phone: images 7.2 MB (91), scripts 1.9 MB (44) and stylesheets 203 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 3.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    641 KiB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Attract-more-qualified-candidates-home.png at 1,520 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 641 KiB.

  • 20 images below the first screen load straight away

    20 images further down the page (2.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.73 g of CO₂e: 327.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8789
  • 12 tap targets too small

    12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (35 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9295
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 221 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 221 pages on joveo.com and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 134 characters

    Your meta description is 134 characters: “Orchestrate AI agents to run end-to-end recruiting workflows. Drive more qualified applicants, faster hires, and unmatc…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Be the Agentic”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Agentic Recruiting Platform | The #1 AI Platform for Hiring”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.joveo.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.joveo.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,774 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.joveo.com/llms.txt (15 KiB, 63 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.joveo.com/ai-interview-scheduling is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.joveo.com/agentic-recruiting-platform, https://www.joveo.com/talent-crm-candidate-relationship-management-engagement-platform, https://www.joveo.com/direct-employers, https://www.joveo.com/staffing-agency-partnerships, https://www.joveo.com/recruitment-process-outsourcing and https://www.joveo.com/recruitment-marketing-agencies have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 77 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9297
  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    39 of 39 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,071 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,071 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Get a Demo”, “Learn More” and “How does pricing work for Joveo?”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 18 customer or partner logos and 16 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at joveo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Employees
28

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on joveo.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25