Website review, no card needed
juaraskincare.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202638 issues · 81 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on juaraskincare.com, 6 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #49,558 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 49%
- #32,677 of 61,859 online storesbeats 41%
- #31,350 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 38%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 159 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 262 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
0.9 s
1.4 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 72
72/100Your mobile performance score is 72. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 750 ms.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 122 KiB6 images could be 122 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
1,957 HTML elements
The page has 1,957 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (ahrefs.com, Shopify and Google CDN and others), adding 113 KiB and 7 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
18 KiBAbout 18 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
11 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (11 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.6 s
A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 35 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 33 ms
33 msYour server sent the HTML in 33 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sYour largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Real-user INP: 255 ms
255 msReal visitors wait 255 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 65% slower for real visitors
+65%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 159 ms to 262 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 6.8 s
6.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.113
0.113The layout shifts by 0.113 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 717 ms
717 msReal visitors wait 717 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 2.3 s
2.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Candlenut_Body_Creme_MOBILE_TEMPLATE_1080x1800_3ad1447d-bcd3 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
83 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Logo-JUARA_preview.webp at 1,280 px wide, shown at 200 px. Resized copies would save about 83 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (106 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.47 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.47 g of CO₂e: 56.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.7 MB in 48 requests
1.7 MBYour homepage downloads 1.7 MB in 48 requests on a phone: images 728 KiB (17), scripts 451 KiB (21) and fonts 267 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
42 text elements with low contrast
42 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
37 images without alt text
37 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (5 elements)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (3 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (3 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h4 → h6, h4 → h6 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “JUARA Skincare - 100% Plant Based Skincare | Jamu Herbal Tradition”.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Candlenut Body Creme”, “Candlenut Body Creme” and “CandlenutBody Creme”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (238 characters)
Your meta description is 238 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
7 links crawlers can't follow
7 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
7 links with vague text
7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
141 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 141 pages on juaraskincare.com and 14 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.juaraskincare.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage and WebPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.juaraskincare.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,661 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.juaraskincare.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.juaraskincare.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.juaraskincare.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.juaraskincare.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.juaraskincare.com/pages/black-friday-sale, https://www.juaraskincare.com/collections/all-products, https://www.juaraskincare.com/products/candlenut-bar-soap, https://www.juaraskincare.com/products/travel-size-miracle-tea-complete-eye-creme-3ml, https://www.juaraskincare.com/products/anti-aging-hand-cream-coconut-illipe and https://www.juaraskincare.com/products/tiare-jasmine-body-creme-8-oz and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
11 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 854 words of copy
The homepage carries about 854 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NOW”.
15 calls to action
The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “SHOP ALL”, “JAMU LIFESTYLE BOOK” and “SHOP ALL View All”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at juaraskincare.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 5 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Mp Instagram Feed · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Free Gift · 9gtb.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- New York
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on juaraskincare.com, including 12 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.