Website review, no card needed
juicepress.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202654 issues · 100 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on juicepress.com, 28 of them high impact, across 100 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72C- #84,843 of 108,838 reviewed websitesbeats 19%
- #52,556 of 61,763 online storesbeats 12%
- #49,081 of 56,363 Shopify storesbeats 11%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 143 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.7 s
2.6 s
3.4 s
4.3 s
5.2 s
6.0 s
6.9 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
14.4 s · 6.1 MB32 images could be 6.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 902 KiBAbout 902 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.7 s · 575 KiB25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (575 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.7 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.
audioeye-services.com adds 1.5 s
1.5 saudioeye-services.com costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.9 s
A phone's processor spends 6.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (audioeye-services.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 513 ms
513 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 513 ms of main-thread work and 507 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 56 KiBAbout 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 259 ms
259 msFacebook costs a phone 259 ms of main-thread work and 280 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,863 HTML elements
The page has 1,863 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 243 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
71 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 71 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
40 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Duplicated JavaScript
32 KiB32 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 13 ms
13 msYour server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 38.5 s
38.5 sYour largest element takes 38.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 16.3 s
16.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 46.5 s
46.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 46.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 734 ms
734 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 734 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors
+23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 143 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
22 images without width and height
22 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 154 ms
154 msReal visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 534 ms
534 msReal visitors wait 534 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.2 MB in 282 requests
11.2 MBYour homepage downloads 11.2 MB in 282 requests on a phone: images 7.5 MB (53), scripts 2.5 MB (100) and other files 845 KiB (105). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 5.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images far larger than shown
5.7 MB8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example JP_Website_-_Meal_Plan.jpg at 3,024 px wide, shown at 180 px. Resized copies would save about 5.7 MB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (2.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit
3.16 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.16 g of CO₂e: 379.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
7 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (7 elements)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (3 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (7 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (6 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Hidden but focusable
3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
10 images without alt text
10 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
13 links without text
13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (3 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 67 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 19 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (68 characters)
Your title is 68 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Juice Press - Order Organic Smoothies, Juices, Acai Bowls, and more!”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“<img src="//www.juicepress.com/cdn/shop/files/jpr…” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
10 links crawlers can't follow
10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
33 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 33 pages on juicepress.com and 15 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 145 characters
Your meta description is 145 characters: “Fresh organic juices, smoothies, and bowls from Juice Press. 25+ locations across New York and beyond, with delivery, p…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.juicepress.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.juicepress.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,039 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.juicepress.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.juicepress.com/pages/order-now has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.juicepress.com/pages/order-now has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
13 internal pages checked
We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187145773&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=0e406854-90dc-4b27-b566-7f6bd4aa9685&bo=1&sid=a6cb3570d3e411f195cb7f712f038eb7&vid=a6cb9390d3e411f190d67b3bbbf5c78a&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
32 of 39 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 10 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 290 words of copy
The homepage carries about 290 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “ORDER AHEAD” and “ORDER ONLINE”.
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Order Ahead”, “Order Online” and “Order online”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Segment.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
47 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at juicepress.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Founded
- 2010
- Headquarters
- New York City
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 54 issues on juicepress.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.