Website review, no card needed

junoandme.de logo

junoandme.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202631 issues · 82 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on junoandme.de, 10 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.8 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
193 ms134 msMay 16Oct 31164 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026186 ms
May 23, 2026186 ms
May 30, 2026182 ms
Jun 6, 2026167 ms
Jun 13, 2026158 ms
Jun 20, 2026160 ms
Jun 27, 2026169 ms
Jul 4, 2026171 ms
Jul 11, 2026172 ms
Jul 18, 2026170 ms
Jul 25, 2026162 ms
Aug 1, 2026148 ms
Aug 8, 2026141 ms
Aug 15, 2026142 ms
Aug 22, 2026142 ms
Aug 29, 2026144 ms
Sep 5, 2026145 ms
Sep 12, 2026146 ms
Sep 19, 2026154 ms
Sep 26, 2026159 ms
Oct 3, 2026152 ms
Oct 10, 2026161 ms
Oct 17, 2026162 ms
Oct 24, 2026161 ms
Oct 31, 2026164 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of junoandme.de (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. junoandme.de at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. junoandme.de at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. junoandme.de at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. junoandme.de at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. junoandme.de at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. junoandme.de at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. junoandme.de at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. junoandme.de at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix83
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • 3,810 HTML elements

    The page has 3,810 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 83

    83/100

    Your mobile performance score is 83. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Reviews.io, Klaviyo and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.1 MB and 354 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    381 KiB

    About 381 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 946 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    262 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (262 KiB).

  • Reviews.io adds 91 ms

    91 ms

    Reviews.io costs a phone 91 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    119 KiB

    5 images could be 119 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 27 ms

    27 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 13.7 s

    13.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Glow Below Oil, Nr. 1 Bestseller, pflegt nach der Rasur”.

  • Speed Index: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 483 ms

    483 ms

    Real visitors wait 483 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 186 ms to 164 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 57% faster for real visitors

    -57%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.014

    0.014

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.014, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 60 ms

    60 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 60 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.8 MB in 363 requests

    3.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 363 requests on a phone: other files 1.7 MB (180), scripts 1.1 MB (80) and images 554 KiB (74). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    20260903_Date_Night_Ritual_WebShop_Banner_Homepage_Mobile_41 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.08 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.08 g of CO₂e: 129.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8993
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 137 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is long (68 characters)

    Your title is 68 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Natürliche Pflegeprodukte für den Intimbereich & zur Rasur | juno&me”.

  • 272 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 272 pages on junoandme.de and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Natürliche und hochwertige Fe:male Care Produkte für deinen Intimbereich von juno&me entdecken! ✨ Beruhigende Pflege ✓ …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Intimpflege und Pflege nach der Rasur von juno&me”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://junoandme.de/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://junoandme.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,905 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://junoandme.de/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 83 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6970
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://as.ad4m.at/ad/dst?a=10525&b=2&c=LdqjxxN3qzgSsYovSJxv5Bj-ZLlWb4RB&e=454438&f=&g=&h=&i=&z=0&y=1&d=https%3A%2F%2Fjunoandme.de%2F.

  • 24 small tap targets

    24 of 60 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 9 third-party cookies

    9 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Bad element for Flickity: null”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • A 12-field form

    Your longest form asks for 12 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 801 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 801 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 6 customer or partner logos and 7 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar and TikTok Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Microsoft Clarity and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 34 cookies set on arrival

    34

    Opening the homepage sets 34 cookies, 9 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 46 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at junoandme.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Microsoft Clarity · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Selleasy · Reviews Co Uk Product And Merchant Review Collection

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Hiring

Hiring
1 open role
Job board
careers page

Company

Headquarters
Wetzlar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on junoandme.de, including 13 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25