Website review, no card needed

kaplan.com.sg logo

kaplan.com.sg website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202639 issues · 81 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on kaplan.com.sg, 15 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.9 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 243.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.6 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
218 ms169 msMay 9Oct 24212 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026179 ms
May 16, 2026175 ms
May 23, 2026177 ms
May 30, 2026182 ms
Jun 6, 2026187 ms
Jun 13, 2026187 ms
Jun 20, 2026186 ms
Jun 27, 2026184 ms
Jul 4, 2026180 ms
Jul 11, 2026182 ms
Jul 18, 2026184 ms
Jul 25, 2026183 ms
Aug 1, 2026184 ms
Aug 8, 2026183 ms
Aug 15, 2026187 ms
Aug 22, 2026191 ms
Aug 29, 2026193 ms
Sep 5, 2026200 ms
Sep 12, 2026202 ms
Sep 19, 2026208 ms
Sep 26, 2026208 ms
Oct 3, 2026206 ms
Oct 10, 2026211 ms
Oct 17, 2026210 ms
Oct 24, 2026212 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kaplan.com.sg (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kaplan.com.sg at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. kaplan.com.sg at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. kaplan.com.sg at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. kaplan.com.sg at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. kaplan.com.sg at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. kaplan.com.sg at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. kaplan.com.sg at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. kaplan.com.sg at 3.4 s3.4 s

Speed

10 to fix41
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.1 s · 621 KiB

    About 621 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.2 s · 228 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (228 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    51 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 758 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    564 KiB

    1 image could be 564 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 384 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,531 HTML elements

    The page has 1,531 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    19 KiB

    19 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.2 s

    16.2 s

    Your largest element takes 16.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Odeon 333 Homepage Banner v1”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.5 s

    16.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 93% slower for real visitors

    +93%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 179 ms to 212 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 177 ms

    177 ms

    Real visitors wait 177 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix70
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Odeon 333 Homepage Banner v1.png weighs 598 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 195 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 195 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (84), images 1.3 MB (30) and stylesheets 81 KiB (51). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (61 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.87 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.87 g of CO₂e: 104.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8992
  • 35 text elements with low contrast

    35 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h6 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9281
  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“”, “Where do you see yourself in the future?” and “STUDY WITH KAPLAN AND OUR RENOWNED PARTNERS”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (204 characters)

    Your meta description is 204 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found ((untyped) and EducationalOrganization) but with 2 problems, for example “block has no @type”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 192 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 192 pages on kaplan.com.sg and 8 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “From Diploma to Degree (Online & Onsite) - Kaplan (Singapore)”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.kaplan.com.sg/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kaplan.com.sg/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.kaplan.com.sg/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,444 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.kaplan.com.sg/academic-levels/diplomas-courses/part-time has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 98 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,145 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,145 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Download Brochure”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Download Brochure” and “Learn more”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 23 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kaplan.com.sg, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Framework
Vue.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
1989

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on kaplan.com.sg, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25