Website review, no card needed

keng.ru logo

keng.ru website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202635 issues · 73 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on keng.ru, 10 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s2.4 sMay 2Oct 172.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.6 s
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
183 ms156 msMay 2Oct 17171 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026163 ms
May 9, 2026163 ms
May 16, 2026159 ms
May 23, 2026163 ms
May 30, 2026164 ms
Jun 6, 2026168 ms
Jun 13, 2026175 ms
Jun 20, 2026179 ms
Jun 27, 2026180 ms
Jul 4, 2026173 ms
Jul 11, 2026170 ms
Jul 18, 2026169 ms
Jul 25, 2026167 ms
Aug 1, 2026172 ms
Aug 8, 2026178 ms
Aug 15, 2026176 ms
Aug 22, 2026173 ms
Aug 29, 2026172 ms
Sep 5, 2026170 ms
Sep 12, 2026170 ms
Sep 19, 2026170 ms
Sep 26, 2026169 ms
Oct 3, 2026167 ms
Oct 10, 2026171 ms
Oct 17, 2026171 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of keng.ru (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. keng.ru at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. keng.ru at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. keng.ru at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. keng.ru at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. keng.ru at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. keng.ru at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. keng.ru at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. keng.ru at 3.8 s3.8 s

Speed

4 to fix69
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 446 KiB

    About 446 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 69

    69/100

    Your mobile performance score is 69 (desktop: 78). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 283 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    83 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (83 KiB).

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (mail.ru and Yandex Metrica), adding 130 KiB and 68 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    34 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    13 KiB

    About 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 277 ms

    277 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 277 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Your largest element takes 4.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Женщины”.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 328 ms

    328 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 328 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 163 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 199 ms

    199 ms

    Real visitors wait 199 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005

    0.005

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix97
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    image is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.43 g of CO₂e: 51.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.5 MB in 85 requests

    1.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 85 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (59), fonts 108 KiB (4) and images 77 KiB (9). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8388
  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 24 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 30 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 24 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10072
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “Выбор раздела”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (233 characters)

    Your meta description is 233 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Only 1 internal link

    The homepage links to only 1 page on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.keng.ru/welcome/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.keng.ru/upload/sitemap/current/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.keng.ru/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.keng.ru/welcome and / all use the title “Выбор раздела”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://www.keng.ru/welcome. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    / has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 internal page checked

    We fetched 1 page linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 1 page we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7796
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 0 words

    The homepage has only about 0 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at keng.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on keng.ru, including 11 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25