Website review, no card needed
kenner.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202651 issues · 93 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on kenner.com.br, 26 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 189 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 191 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 244 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.0 s
3.0 s
4.0 s
5.1 s
6.1 s
7.1 s
8.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.6 s · 1.1 MB313 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.7 s26 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 460 KiBAbout 460 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
vtex.com.br adds 1.4 s
1.4 svtex.com.br costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 87 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
10,888 HTML elements
The page has 10,888 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.5 s
A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtex.com.br, Google Tag Manager and vtex.com and others), adding 5.9 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 970 ms
970 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 970 ms of main-thread work and 856 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.0 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
850 KiB64 images could be 850 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
630 ms · 84 KiBAbout 84 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 630 ms faster on a phone.
vteximg.com.br adds 65 ms
65 msvteximg.com.br costs a phone 65 ms of main-thread work and 4.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 21.6 s
21.6 sYour largest element takes 21.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “FULL MOB BF 2026”.
Time to Interactive: 24.4 s
24.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sThe first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.2 s
8.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 245 ms
245 msReal visitors wait 245 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 189 ms to 244 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
18 images without width and height
18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.124
0.124The layout shifts by 0.124 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.0 MB in 400 requests
6.0 MBYour homepage downloads 6.0 MB in 400 requests on a phone: images 4.4 MB (259), scripts 1.3 MB (57) and fonts 181 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.71 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.71 g of CO₂e: 205.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (3 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
139 form fields without a label
139 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (27 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 27 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (8 elements).
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
888 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 888 pages on kenner.com.br and 22 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 147 characters
Your meta description is 147 characters: “Compre sandálias Kenner originais na loja oficial. Modelos Megah, Rakka, Kivah, Ibiza e mais. Aproveite pagando no Pix …”.
Title: 48 characters
Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Sandália Kenner: Mais que Chinelo | Loja Oficial”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.kenner.com.br/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at http://www.kenner.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.kenner.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,490 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.kenner.com.br/chinelo-do-flamengo and https://www.kenner.com.br/times-cariocas/chinelo-flamengo all use the title “Kenner e Flamengo: Collab de raça, amor e paixão!”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.kenner.com.br/chinelo-do-flamengo and https://www.kenner.com.br/times-cariocas/chinelo-flamengo use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.kenner.com.br/637, whose canonical is https://www.kenner.com.br/sistema. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
9 pages without an H1
https://www.kenner.com.br/blackfriday/last-chance, https://www.kenner.com.br/lennon, https://www.kenner.com.br/especial/lennon, https://www.kenner.com.br/637, https://www.kenner.com.br/times-cariocas and https://www.kenner.com.br/times-cariocas/chinelo-botafogo and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.kenner.com.br/637, https://www.kenner.com.br/chinelo-de-time/santos-futebol-clube/especial and https://www.kenner.com.br/chinelo-de-time/spfc/especial took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 108 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Event name is not defined”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
434 of 438 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 3,013 words of copy
The homepage carries about 3,013 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
3 checks passed
3 short forms
3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kenner.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Newfold Digital
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on kenner.com.br, including 26 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.