Website review, no card needed

khanbank.com logo

khanbank.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202646 issues · 71 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on khanbank.com, 25 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s3.3 sMay 9Oct 243.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.5 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
232 ms188 msMay 9Oct 24203 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026210 ms
May 16, 2026209 ms
May 23, 2026209 ms
May 30, 2026211 ms
Jun 6, 2026214 ms
Jun 13, 2026214 ms
Jun 20, 2026213 ms
Jun 27, 2026211 ms
Jul 4, 2026210 ms
Jul 11, 2026212 ms
Jul 18, 2026216 ms
Jul 25, 2026220 ms
Aug 1, 2026225 ms
Aug 8, 2026227 ms
Aug 15, 2026219 ms
Aug 22, 2026214 ms
Aug 29, 2026204 ms
Sep 5, 2026195 ms
Sep 12, 2026194 ms
Sep 19, 2026193 ms
Sep 26, 2026194 ms
Oct 3, 2026195 ms
Oct 10, 2026199 ms
Oct 17, 2026202 ms
Oct 24, 2026203 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of khanbank.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. khanbank.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. khanbank.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  3. khanbank.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  4. khanbank.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  5. khanbank.com at 8.1 s8.1 s
  6. khanbank.com at 9.7 s9.7 s
  7. khanbank.com at 11.3 s11.3 s
  8. khanbank.com at 12.9 s12.9 s

Speed

11 to fix11
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.8 s · 1.8 MB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    2.4 s · 1.6 MB

    10 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.6 s · 500 KiB

    About 500 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    2.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.1 s).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 319 KiB

    About 319 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 11

    11/100

    Your mobile performance score is 11 (desktop: 44). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,095 HTML elements

    The page has 4,095 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 594 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    400 ms · 27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, perfdrive.com and Google Analytics), adding 313 KiB and 374 ms of main-thread time.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 44 but mobile only 11. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.96

    0.96

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.96 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.364

    1.364

    The layout shifts by 1.364 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.9 s

    20.9 s

    Your largest element takes 20.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “image”. Most of its time is resource load delay (9.2 s).

  • Speed Index: 19.5 s

    19.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 19.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.8 s

    21.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 203 ms

    203 ms

    Real visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 210 ms to 203 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 655 ms

    655 ms

    Real visitors wait 655 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 4.0 MB in 124 requests

    4.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 124 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (24), scripts 1.2 MB (32) and fonts 505 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.14 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.14 g of CO₂e: 137.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7289
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Links must have discernible text (4 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 7 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 8363
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “Иргэд | ХААН Банк”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (305 characters)

    Your meta description is 305 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.khanbank.com/sitemap-1.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

2 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.khanbank.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9297
  • 5 distorted images

    5 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 0 words

    The homepage has only about 0 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at khanbank.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Khanbank As Ap Khan Bank Llc

Company

Founded
1991
Headquarters
Ulaanbaatar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on khanbank.com, including 22 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25