Website review, no card needed

king5.com logo

king5.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202626 issues · 64 checks

This review found 26 issues worth fixing on king5.com, 13 of them high impact, across 64 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 12.2 MB. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.4 sApr 18Oct 31.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.7 s
Apr 25, 20261.7 s
May 2, 20261.7 s
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
246 ms166 msApr 18Oct 3221 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026175 ms
Apr 25, 2026183 ms
May 2, 2026190 ms
May 9, 2026197 ms
May 16, 2026203 ms
May 23, 2026205 ms
May 30, 2026205 ms
Jun 6, 2026211 ms
Jun 13, 2026216 ms
Jun 20, 2026214 ms
Jun 27, 2026214 ms
Jul 4, 2026212 ms
Jul 11, 2026212 ms
Jul 18, 2026218 ms
Jul 25, 2026222 ms
Aug 1, 2026221 ms
Aug 8, 2026228 ms
Aug 15, 2026229 ms
Aug 22, 2026230 ms
Aug 29, 2026237 ms
Sep 5, 2026236 ms
Sep 12, 2026232 ms
Sep 19, 2026230 ms
Sep 26, 2026226 ms
Oct 3, 2026221 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of king5.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

Speed

Not measured in this review.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 222 ms

    222 ms

    Real visitors wait 222 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors

    +25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 175 ms to 221 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 620 ms

    620 ms

    Real visitors wait 620 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 12.2 MB

    12.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.2 MB on a phone, 8.1 MB of it images (66%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images over 500 KB

    6 images weigh 4.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 12 images far larger than shown

    3.9 MB

    12 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example d0fcd517-9aff-4ca5-8cf3-1da60151236a_1920x1080.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 3.9 MB.

  • 21 images in older formats

    21 images (7.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 15 images below the first screen load straight away

    15 images further down the page (6.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.47 g of CO₂e: 416.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fix86
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 10 images without alt text

    10 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h1 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fix84
  • Title is long (97 characters)

    Your title is 97 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Seattle's Leading Local News: Weather, Traffic, Sports and More | Seattle, Washington | k…”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (204 characters)

    Your meta description is 204 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 163 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 163 pages on king5.com and 7 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Seattle's Leading Local News: Weather, Traffic, Sports and More | Seattle, Washington”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.king5.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.king5.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,242 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 96 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fix93
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    19 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,371 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,371 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Try Again”, “Contact Us” and “Download KING 5+”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 12 trackers load before any consent

    12

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 7 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 29 cookies set on arrival

    29

    Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 74 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 74 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at king5.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 26 issues on king5.com, including 3 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25