Website review, no card needed

kinship.co logo

kinship.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202634 issues · 82 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on kinship.co, 15 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.5 sMay 16Oct 311.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
178 ms142 msMay 16Oct 31150 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026174 ms
May 23, 2026171 ms
May 30, 2026169 ms
Jun 6, 2026164 ms
Jun 13, 2026163 ms
Jun 20, 2026163 ms
Jun 27, 2026164 ms
Jul 4, 2026162 ms
Jul 11, 2026156 ms
Jul 18, 2026153 ms
Jul 25, 2026148 ms
Aug 1, 2026146 ms
Aug 8, 2026148 ms
Aug 15, 2026149 ms
Aug 22, 2026150 ms
Aug 29, 2026151 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026153 ms
Sep 19, 2026153 ms
Sep 26, 2026154 ms
Oct 3, 2026154 ms
Oct 10, 2026154 ms
Oct 17, 2026153 ms
Oct 24, 2026152 ms
Oct 31, 2026150 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kinship.co (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kinship.co at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. kinship.co at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. kinship.co at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. kinship.co at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. kinship.co at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. kinship.co at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. kinship.co at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. kinship.co at 3.6 s3.6 s

Speed

11 to fix37
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.7 s · 849 KiB

    About 849 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 460 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (460 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,064 HTML elements

    The page has 4,064 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Facebook and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 749 ms

    749 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 749 ms of main-thread work and 882 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    100 ms · 638 KiB

    18 images could be 638 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 298 ms

    298 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 298 ms of main-thread work and 533 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 305 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 48 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 48 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.9 s

    20.9 s

    Your largest element takes 20.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Photo of Spice”.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.5 s

    22.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 993 ms

    993 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 993 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 992 ms

    992 ms

    Real visitors wait 992 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 190 ms

    190 ms

    Real visitors wait 190 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 174 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix74
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 154 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 154 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (59), images 796 KiB (32) and fonts 213 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    1324947662 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    100 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example image at 2,400 px wide, shown at 285 px. Resized copies would save about 100 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (43 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.04 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.04 g of CO₂e: 124.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9294
  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (70 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 70 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 53 form fields without a label

    53 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1,089 internal links, 34 external

    The homepage links to 1,089 pages on kinship.co and 34 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 129 characters

    Your meta description is 129 characters: “Adoptapet.com is an animal welfare organization featuring adoptable pets from over 15,000 animal shelters in the U.S. a…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Ready to adopt a pet?”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Adopt a Pet: Search Dogs, Cats & Pets for Adoption Near You”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.adoptapet.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.adoptapet.com/sitemaps/sitemapindex.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.adoptapet.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,143 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix67
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.adoptapet.com/animal-shelters-near-me has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.adoptapet.com/blog and https://www.adoptapet.com/shelter-guide all use the title “Adopt a Pet – Pet Advice for Adopters and Pet Parents”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.adoptapet.com/animal-shelters-near-me and https://www.adoptapet.com/dog-breeds have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.adoptapet.com/blog and https://www.adoptapet.com/shelter-guide use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.adoptapet.com/animal-shelters-near-me, https://www.adoptapet.com/blog and https://www.adoptapet.com/shelter-guide have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    19 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,908 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,908 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Get started”, “Shop” and “Submit a request”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kinship.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
CloudFront

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on kinship.co, including 19 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25