Website review, no card needed

kisankraft.com logo

kisankraft.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202640 issues · 83 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on kisankraft.com, 10 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 242.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
202 ms153 msMay 9Oct 24196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026161 ms
May 16, 2026159 ms
May 23, 2026163 ms
May 30, 2026167 ms
Jun 6, 2026172 ms
Jun 13, 2026173 ms
Jun 20, 2026172 ms
Jun 27, 2026170 ms
Jul 4, 2026169 ms
Jul 11, 2026167 ms
Jul 18, 2026169 ms
Jul 25, 2026172 ms
Aug 1, 2026171 ms
Aug 8, 2026178 ms
Aug 15, 2026181 ms
Aug 22, 2026183 ms
Aug 29, 2026188 ms
Sep 5, 2026185 ms
Sep 12, 2026182 ms
Sep 19, 2026183 ms
Sep 26, 2026184 ms
Oct 3, 2026185 ms
Oct 10, 2026189 ms
Oct 17, 2026192 ms
Oct 24, 2026196 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kisankraft.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kisankraft.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. kisankraft.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. kisankraft.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. kisankraft.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. kisankraft.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  6. kisankraft.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  7. kisankraft.com at 7.4 s7.4 s
  8. kisankraft.com at 8.4 s8.4 s

Speed

7 to fix62
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Main-thread work: 4.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Clarity and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    833 KiB

    About 833 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 413 ms

    413 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 413 ms of main-thread work and 507 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 302 ms

    302 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 302 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    209 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (209 KiB).

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 193 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    33 KiB

    About 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Improve image delivery

    22 KiB

    1 image could be 22 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 508 ms

    508 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 508 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.6 s

    18.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Your largest element takes 4.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “CELEBRATING TWO DECADES OF AGRICULTURAL EXCELLENCE”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.6 s).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 227 ms

    227 ms

    Real visitors wait 227 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 161 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 323 ms

    323 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 323 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 90 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 90 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (31), images 683 KiB (23) and other files 371 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.88 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.88 g of CO₂e: 105.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8692
  • 12 buttons without a name

    12 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (33 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 33 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 58 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9274
  • Title is long (85 characters)

    Your title is 85 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Best Agriculture Machinery/Equipment Manufacturers in India | KisanKraft | KisanKraft”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“CELEBRATING TWO DECADES OF AGRICULTURAL EXCELLENCE”, “EMPOWERING COMMUNITIES WITH FUTURE-READY SOLUTIONS” and “20 YEARS OF TRUST, INNOVATION & GROWTH”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (192 characters)

    Your meta description is 192 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 29 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 29 pages on kisankraft.com and 6 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://kisankraft.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kisankraft.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://kisankraft.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,134 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 9 pages share a title

    /, https://kisankraft.com/about, https://kisankraft.com/find-a-dealer, https://kisankraft.com/blog, https://kisankraft.com/media and https://kisankraft.com/dealership and 3 others all use the title “Best Agriculture Machinery/Equipment Manufacturers in India | KisanKr…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://kisankraft.com/blog/best-power-weeder-for-small-farmers has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 pages share a meta description

    https://kisankraft.com/about, https://kisankraft.com/find-a-dealer, https://kisankraft.com/blog, https://kisankraft.com/media, https://kisankraft.com/dealership and https://kisankraft.com/contact and 2 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://kisankraft.com/product-category, https://kisankraft.com/product-category/agri-machinery, https://kisankraft.com/product-category/power-tools and https://kisankraft.com/product-category/seeds have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix86
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • About 1,135 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,135 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT” and “ENQUIRE”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “ENQUIRE”, “Shop Now” and “LEARN MORE”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kisankraft.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on kisankraft.com, including 18 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25