Website review, no card needed

labconco.com logo

labconco.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202634 issues · 82 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on labconco.com, 11 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce initial server response time. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.8 s2.2 sMay 9Oct 242.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.4 s
May 16, 20264.3 s
May 23, 20264.4 s
May 30, 20264.3 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.5 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
169 ms134 msMay 9Oct 24156 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026161 ms
May 16, 2026165 ms
May 23, 2026152 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026160 ms
Jun 13, 2026154 ms
Jun 20, 2026164 ms
Jun 27, 2026160 ms
Jul 4, 2026147 ms
Jul 11, 2026154 ms
Jul 18, 2026151 ms
Jul 25, 2026156 ms
Aug 1, 2026154 ms
Aug 8, 2026145 ms
Aug 15, 2026141 ms
Aug 22, 2026138 ms
Aug 29, 2026145 ms
Sep 5, 2026150 ms
Sep 12, 2026149 ms
Sep 19, 2026153 ms
Sep 26, 2026138 ms
Oct 3, 2026140 ms
Oct 10, 2026151 ms
Oct 17, 2026153 ms
Oct 24, 2026156 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of labconco.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. labconco.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. labconco.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. labconco.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. labconco.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. labconco.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. labconco.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  7. labconco.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. labconco.com at 6.8 s6.8 s

Speed

9 to fix47
  • Reduce initial server response time

    2.8 s

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 2.8 s on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    2.8 s

    The HTML itself could arrive about 2.8 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Server response: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Your server takes 2.9 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 709 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 413 KiB

    About 413 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    276 KiB

    9 images could be 276 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1,540 HTML elements

    The page has 1,540 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    223 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (223 KiB).

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cdn-cookieyes.com and Cloudflare and others), adding 297 KiB and 188 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    100 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 100 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    27 KiB

    About 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Your largest element takes 7.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Laboratory space with installed equipment, lab planning”. Most of its time is time to first byte (2.9 s).

  • Time to Interactive: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 211 ms

    211 ms

    Real visitors wait 211 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 585 ms

    585 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 585 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 161 ms to 156 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 43% faster for real visitors

    -43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.021

    0.021

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.021, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix69
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 116 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 116 requests on a phone: scripts 961 KiB (72), HTML 534 KiB (1) and images 412 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    50_Year_BSC_Homepage_Banner_Image_1920x1080_blue_tint.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    90 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example freezonegroup-1000x1000.png at 1,000 px wide, shown at 200 px. Resized copies would save about 90 KiB.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.63 g of CO₂e: 75.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9594
  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (76 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 76 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10083
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“For the Love of the Lab”, “Direct Access to Peer-Reviewed Studies” and “A Legacy of Biosafety Innovation”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (194 characters)

    Your meta description is 194 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 171 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 171 pages on labconco.com and 15 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Labconco | Laboratory Equipment & Lab Safety Products”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.labconco.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.labconco.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,272 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.labconco.com/llms.txt (1 KiB, 4 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.labconco.com/category/food-ag and https://www.labconco.com/food-bev-ag all use the title “Food, Bev & Ag”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 81 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9697
  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    94 of 95 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 739 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 739 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at labconco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Employees
284

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on labconco.com, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25