Website review, no card needed
labfarve.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202647 issues · 89 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on labfarve.com, 19 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64D- #98,504 of 104,602 reviewed websitesbeats 5%
- #56,976 of 58,595 online storesbeats 2%
- #52,181 of 53,362 Shopify storesbeats 2%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 98 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 116 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.4 s
3.2 s
4.0 s
4.8 s
5.6 s
6.4 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.9 s · 828 KiB16 images could be 828 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.6 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 606 KiBAbout 606 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 462 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 14
14/100Your mobile performance score is 14 (desktop: 71). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.8 s
A phone's processor spends 8.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Facebook and others), adding 1.2 MB and 2.7 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 822 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Hubspot adds 599 ms
599 msHubspot costs a phone 599 ms of main-thread work and 108 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 105 KiBAbout 105 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 331 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (331 KiB).
Facebook adds 383 ms
383 msFacebook costs a phone 383 ms of main-thread work and 180 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 171 ms
171 msShopify costs a phone 171 ms of main-thread work and 363 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,693 HTML elements
The page has 1,693 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
20 KiB20 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 71 but mobile only 14. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.8 s
14.8 sYour largest element takes 14.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 19.3 s
19.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.3 s
2.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.4 s
8.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.29
0.29The layout shifts by 0.29 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors
+20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
39 images without width and height
39 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 136 ms
136 msReal visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 511 ms
511 msReal visitors wait 511 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.9 MB in 195 requests
3.9 MBYour homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 195 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (55), images 1.4 MB (29) and other files 780 KiB (98). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images far larger than shown
477 KiB7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example BANNER_PRINCIPAL_CAMPANA_2_1900x.jpg at 1,900 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 477 KiB.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.11 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.11 g of CO₂e: 133.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
4 buttons without a name
4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
41 text elements with low contrast
41 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
6 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (68 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 68 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
68 links without text
68 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (8 characters)
Your title is only 8 characters: “LABFARVE”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
196 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 196 pages on labfarve.com and 7 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Tiendas naturistas, productos orgánicos, productos naturales, medicamento natural, medicamentos naturales, envíos, domi…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.labfarve.com.co/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.labfarve.com.co/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,476 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.labfarve.com.co/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/cosmeticos-con-cbd/Cosm%C3%A9ticos-con-Cannabidiol and https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/cosmeticos-con-cbd all use the title “Cosméticos con CBD – LABFARVE”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/sistema-nervioso, https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/sistema-respiratorio, https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/sistema-circulatorio, https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/sistema-digestivo, https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/sistema-urinario and https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/sistema-locomotor and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/cosmeticos-con-cbd/Cosm%C3%A9ticos-con-Cannabidiol and https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/cosmeticos-con-cbd use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/cosmeticos-con-cbd/Cosm%C3%A9ticos-con-Cannabidiol, whose canonical is https://www.labfarve.com.co/collections/cosmeticos-con-cbd. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 66 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected end of input”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
55 of 62 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 30 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 391 words of copy
The homepage carries about 391 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
30 short forms
30 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
31 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at labfarve.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on labfarve.com, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.