Website review, no card needed

laclinica.com logo

laclinica.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202642 issues · 92 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on laclinica.com, 16 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 312.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
172 ms130 msMay 16Oct 31167 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026138 ms
May 23, 2026145 ms
May 30, 2026138 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026141 ms
Jun 20, 2026154 ms
Jun 27, 2026146 ms
Jul 4, 2026146 ms
Jul 11, 2026144 ms
Jul 18, 2026145 ms
Jul 25, 2026147 ms
Aug 1, 2026153 ms
Aug 8, 2026164 ms
Aug 15, 2026156 ms
Aug 22, 2026157 ms
Aug 29, 2026140 ms
Sep 5, 2026140 ms
Sep 12, 2026142 ms
Sep 19, 2026143 ms
Sep 26, 2026162 ms
Oct 3, 2026146 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms
Oct 17, 2026146 ms
Oct 24, 2026135 ms
Oct 31, 2026167 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of laclinica.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. laclinica.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. laclinica.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. laclinica.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. laclinica.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. laclinica.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  6. laclinica.com at 5.8 s5.8 s
  7. laclinica.com at 6.8 s6.8 s
  8. laclinica.com at 7.7 s7.7 s

Speed

14 to fix39
  • Improve image delivery

    1.9 s · 1.8 MB

    20 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (amaicdn.com, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    736 KiB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (736 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 96 KiB

    About 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • amaicdn.com adds 229 ms

    229 ms

    amaicdn.com costs a phone 229 ms of main-thread work and 417 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 199 ms

    199 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 199 ms of main-thread work and 309 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 190 ms

    190 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 190 ms of main-thread work and 379 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,070 HTML elements

    The page has 2,070 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Klaviyo adds 147 ms

    147 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 147 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Yotpo adds 105 ms

    105 ms

    Yotpo costs a phone 105 ms of main-thread work and 318 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 152 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    110 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 110 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    36 KiB

    36 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.1 s

    12.1 s

    Your largest element takes 12.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “placeholder+image”.

  • Speed Index: 17.8 s

    17.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.3 s

    31.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.313

    0.313

    The layout shifts by 0.313 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.14

    0.14

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.14 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 399 ms

    399 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 399 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 167 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 156 ms

    156 ms

    Real visitors wait 156 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 450 ms

    450 ms

    Real visitors wait 450 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix50
  • Page weight: 7.4 MB in 472 requests

    7.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 472 requests on a phone: scripts 2.7 MB (110), images 2.7 MB (52) and other files 1.3 MB (267). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    1.3 MB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example LaClinicaXmas25.jpg at 3,911 px wide, shown at 183 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (221 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (246 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.09 g of CO₂e: 251.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7889
  • Hidden but focusable

    10 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA tooltip nodes must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA tooltip nodes must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 10 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 7791
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “Trusted, high-performance skin care to improve yo…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 124 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 124 pages on laclinica.com and 13 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “For high-performance skin care online, choose LA CLINICA. Made in Australia by us, to ensure the best possible results,…”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “The Best Skin Care Products for Sale Online | La Clinica”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.laclinica.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.laclinica.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (655 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.laclinica.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 75 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 18 small tap targets

    18 of 61 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 822 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 822 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register” and “Contact”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Register”, “SHOP BY PRODUCT RANGE” and “View all SHOP BY PRODUCT RANGE”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 20 cookies set on arrival

    20

    Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 47 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at laclinica.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 12 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Yotpo Product Reviews · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Pre Order · Product Filter Search · Freegifts · Back In Stock · laralancer.com · gorgias.chat · bogos.io · roseperl.com · 9gtb.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Melbourne

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on laclinica.com, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25