Website review, no card needed

lcu.edu logo

lcu.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202631 issues · 80 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on lcu.edu, 6 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s886 msMay 16Oct 31976 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.0 s
May 23, 20261.0 s
May 30, 20261.0 s
Jun 6, 20261.0 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 2026985 ms
Jul 4, 2026944 ms
Jul 11, 2026916 ms
Jul 18, 2026930 ms
Jul 25, 2026981 ms
Aug 1, 2026985 ms
Aug 8, 2026975 ms
Aug 15, 2026929 ms
Aug 22, 2026910 ms
Aug 29, 2026928 ms
Sep 5, 2026922 ms
Sep 12, 2026967 ms
Sep 19, 20261.0 s
Sep 26, 20261.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Oct 24, 2026974 ms
Oct 31, 2026976 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
114 ms81 msMay 16Oct 3185 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026110 ms
May 23, 2026110 ms
May 30, 2026108 ms
Jun 6, 2026102 ms
Jun 13, 202699 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 202695 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202692 ms
Jul 25, 202692 ms
Aug 1, 202692 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202689 ms
Aug 22, 202689 ms
Aug 29, 202688 ms
Sep 5, 202687 ms
Sep 12, 202688 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202686 ms
Oct 24, 202686 ms
Oct 31, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lcu.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lcu.edu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lcu.edu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. lcu.edu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. lcu.edu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. lcu.edu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. lcu.edu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. lcu.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. lcu.edu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix62
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Facebook and others), adding 987 KiB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 811 ms

    811 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 811 ms of main-thread work and 673 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 174 KiB

    2 images could be 174 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    460 KiB

    About 460 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    310 ms · 66 KiB

    About 66 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 336 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    153 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (153 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    45 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 947 ms

    947 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 947 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 882 ms

    882 ms

    Real visitors wait 882 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.211

    0.211

    The layout shifts by 0.211 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Your largest element takes 2.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 94 ms

    94 ms

    Real visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.2 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 11.8 MB in 48 requests

    11.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.8 MB in 48 requests on a phone: media 10.3 MB (1), scripts 1.0 MB (22) and images 252 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.33 g of CO₂e: 399.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 0 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (191 characters)

    Your meta description is 191 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://lcu.edu/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 56 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 56 pages on lcu.edu and 16 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Lubbock Christian University - Get a College Degree”.

  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “LCU: Lubbock Christian University”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://lcu.edu/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://lcu.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (549 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://lcu.edu/admissions/visit-campus, https://lcu.edu/admissions/request-info, https://lcu.edu/degree-completion-programs, https://lcu.edu/admissions/international, https://lcu.edu/admissions/first-time-freshmen and https://lcu.edu/admissions/transfer and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://lcu.edu/admissions/graduate, whose canonical is https://lcu.edu/graduate-catalog/admission-standards. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://lcu.edu/admissions/request-info has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://lcu.edu/admissions/request-info has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 13 small tap targets

    13 of 28 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 443 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 443 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply” and “Inquire”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “Inquire” and “Apply Today!”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lcu.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
TYPO3 CMS
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Hiring

Hiring
4 open roles
Job board
careers page

Company

Employees
392
Founded
1957

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on lcu.edu, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25