Website review, no card needed

leadium.com logo

leadium.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202638 issues · 90 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on leadium.com, 14 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.4 s2.7 sJul 11Oct 173.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.9 s
Sep 12, 20264.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
231 ms159 msJul 25Oct 17175 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jul 25, 2026183 ms
Aug 1, 2026209 ms
Aug 8, 2026209 ms
Aug 15, 2026223 ms
Aug 22, 2026223 ms
Aug 29, 2026219 ms
Sep 5, 2026195 ms
Sep 12, 2026173 ms
Sep 19, 2026195 ms
Sep 26, 2026173 ms
Oct 3, 2026168 ms
Oct 10, 2026167 ms
Oct 17, 2026175 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leadium.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leadium.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. leadium.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. leadium.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. leadium.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. leadium.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. leadium.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. leadium.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  8. leadium.com at 4.3 s4.3 s

Speed

12 to fix35
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 3.0 MB

    About 3.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Wistia adds 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Wistia costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 57). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 7.1 MB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.1 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Wistia, website-files.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 5.8 MB and 2.9 s of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 467 ms

    467 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 467 ms of main-thread work and 4.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 344 ms

    344 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 344 ms of main-thread work and 376 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 67 KiB

    About 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,214 HTML elements

    The page has 2,214 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • apollo.io adds 169 ms

    169 ms

    apollo.io costs a phone 169 ms of main-thread work and 325 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 227 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    204 KiB

    204 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.4 s

    13.4 s

    Your largest element takes 13.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “[email protected] 11035 Lavender Hill Drive Suite 160 Las Ve…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.9 s

    19.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 845 ms

    845 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 845 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.13

    0.13

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 188 ms

    188 ms

    Real visitors wait 188 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 175 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.083

    0.083

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.083, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 10.0 MB in 162 requests

    10.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.0 MB in 162 requests on a phone: media 6.8 MB (10), scripts 1.8 MB (53) and images 870 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.82 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.82 g of CO₂e: 338.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9292
  • 12 text elements with low contrast

    12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (93 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 93 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 11 links without text

    11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 269 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • Meta description is long (224 characters)

    Your meta description is 224 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 110 internal links, 66 external

    The homepage links to 110 pages on leadium.com and 66 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Better Process.Experienced Team.More Revenue.”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “B2B Lead Generation & Sales Appointments | Leadium”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.leadium.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.leadium.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,158 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.leadium.com/llms.txt (35 KiB, 301 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix81
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • A 10-field form

    Your longest form asks for 10 fields (9 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,276 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,276 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more and customize”.

  • 14 calls to action

    The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Schedule Event”, “Pricing” and “Schedule a Consult”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 63 testimonial or review blocks, 40 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 17 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 38 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 38 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leadium.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on leadium.com, including 23 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25