Website review, no card needed

leal.co logo

leal.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202634 issues · 81 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on leal.co, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
167 ms115 msMay 9Oct 24156 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026133 ms
May 16, 2026131 ms
May 23, 2026137 ms
May 30, 2026135 ms
Jun 6, 2026138 ms
Jun 13, 2026136 ms
Jun 20, 2026135 ms
Jun 27, 2026131 ms
Jul 4, 2026127 ms
Jul 11, 2026124 ms
Jul 18, 2026121 ms
Jul 25, 2026126 ms
Aug 1, 2026127 ms
Aug 8, 2026142 ms
Aug 15, 2026143 ms
Aug 22, 2026149 ms
Aug 29, 2026159 ms
Sep 5, 2026153 ms
Sep 12, 2026158 ms
Sep 19, 2026161 ms
Sep 26, 2026160 ms
Oct 3, 2026160 ms
Oct 10, 2026158 ms
Oct 17, 2026157 ms
Oct 24, 2026156 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leal.co (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leal.co at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. leal.co at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. leal.co at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. leal.co at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. leal.co at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. leal.co at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. leal.co at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. leal.co at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix38
  • Render-blocking requests

    8.9 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 755 KiB

    About 755 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 668 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (668 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 46). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 4.0 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 462 ms

    462 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 462 ms of main-thread work and 2.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 454 ms

    454 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 454 ms of main-thread work and 672 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 73 KiB

    About 73 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Hubspot adds 313 ms

    313 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 313 ms of main-thread work and 320 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Facebook adds 265 ms

    265 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 265 ms of main-thread work and 253 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 201 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    50 KiB

    3 images could be 50 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    Your largest element takes 17.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Plataforma de Fidelización y Marketing para Retail Leal 360…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.6 s

    22.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 731 ms

    731 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 731 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 858 ms

    858 ms

    Real visitors wait 858 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 12 images without width and height

    12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 133 ms to 156 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 155 ms

    155 ms

    Real visitors wait 155 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.01

    0.01

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.01, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.3 MB in 104 requests

    4.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 104 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (31), images 1.1 MB (37) and fonts 1.1 MB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (39 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.21 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.21 g of CO₂e: 145.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9396
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (43 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h4 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is long (73 characters)

    Your title is 73 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Leal 360 | Software de Fidelización para Retail — CDP, Campañas y Lealtad”.

  • 43 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 43 pages on leal.co and 10 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Leal 360 centraliza los datos de tus clientes, automatiza campañas y mide el impacto en frecuencia, ticket y CLV. Softw…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Plataforma de Fidelización yMarketing paraRetail”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.leal.co/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: FAQPage and SoftwareApplication.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.leal.co/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,324 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.leal.co/llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 8 pages share 4 titles

    https://www.leal.co/plataforma-segmentacion-clientes and https://www.leal.co/casos-de-uso/conoce-a-tus-clientes all use the title “Plataforma de segmentación de clientes (RFM + IA) para retail”, and 3 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages share a meta description

    https://www.leal.co/plataforma-segmentacion-clientes and https://www.leal.co/casos-de-uso/conoce-a-tus-clientes use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.leal.co/casos-de-uso/conoce-a-tus-clientes, whose canonical is https://www.leal.co/plataforma-segmentacion-clientes. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to fetch at 'https://opps-api.getwarmly.com/api/sessions/trpc/sessions.createSession' from origin 'https://www.l…”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,149 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,149 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Agendar demo”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Agendar demo”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 32 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leal.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Webflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on leal.co, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
leal.co website review: scores and fixes | Programmable