Website review, no card needed

leapinc.com logo

leapinc.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202645 issues · 94 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on leapinc.com, 11 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s848 msMay 9Oct 241.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
103 ms86 msMay 9Jun 688 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026101 ms
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202688 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202688 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leapinc.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leapinc.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. leapinc.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. leapinc.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. leapinc.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. leapinc.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. leapinc.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. leapinc.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. leapinc.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    13.7 MB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    3.3 MB

    4 images could be 3.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Intercom and others), adding 22.0 MB and 954 ms of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 74 ms

    74 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 74 ms of main-thread work and 19.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    850 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.

  • YouTube adds 361 ms

    361 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 361 ms of main-thread work and 1,014 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 177 ms

    177 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 177 ms of main-thread work and 434 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Vimeo adds 33 ms

    33 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 33 ms of main-thread work and 522 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 158 KiB

    About 158 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 174 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.0 s

    26.0 s

    Your largest element takes 26.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Power growth with intelligent retail”.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.3 s

    39.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.242

    0.242

    The layout shifts by 0.242 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 35 images without width and height

    35 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 314 ms

    314 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 314 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 331 ms

    331 ms

    Real visitors wait 331 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 101 ms to 88 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 54% faster for real visitors

    -54%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 22.6 MB in 142 requests

    22.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 22.6 MB in 142 requests on a phone: media 13.6 MB (2), images 5.8 MB (38) and scripts 2.6 MB (54). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 5.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    1.9 MB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 68bee6af86e3642f125cf547_Exterior_1 .png at 1,698 px wide, shown at 288 px. Resized copies would save about 1.9 MB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (3.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 6.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.42 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.42 g of CO₂e: 769.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 9091
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 196 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Power growth with intelligent retail” and “Experience the Platform”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 33 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 33 pages on leapinc.com and 6 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 122 characters

    Your meta description is 122 characters: “Leap is the scalable, turnkey platform for omnichannel retail. Start growing your brick-and-mortar retail footprint tod…”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “The Retail Platform for Modern Brands - Leap Inc”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.leapinc.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.leapinc.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.leapinc.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (842 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.leapinc.com/the-platform and https://www.leapinc.com/the-platform-old all use the title “The Platform”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.leapinc.com/retail-spaces, https://www.leapinc.com/market-details/general, https://www.leapinc.com/benefits, https://www.leapinc.com/diversity and https://www.leapinc.com/interview-process have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.leapinc.com/the-platform and https://www.leapinc.com/the-platform-old use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.leapinc.com/the-platform-old, whose canonical is https://www.leapinc.com/the-platform. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.leapinc.com/market-details/general has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5474
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=27023280&Ver=2&mid=028b1d52-d825-4a35-b15f-05385abab613&bo=1&sid=e2f97100d55811f182b5abc2daf00dcb&vid=e2f9b200d55811f1a35b3345a4c5fc3c&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.

  • 7 third-party cookies

    7 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix81
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 453 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 453 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get started”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Get started”, “contact us directly” and “Get Started”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 53 testimonial or review blocks and 120 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leapinc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Webflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on leapinc.com, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25