Website review, no card needed
legendbiotech.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202642 issues · 92 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on legendbiotech.com, 17 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 67 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 68 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 69 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 73 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
25.0 s · 11.2 MB49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (11.2 MB).
Improve image delivery
20.1 s · 8.0 MB5 images could be 8.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 20.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.0 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.0 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.6 s · 394 KiBAbout 394 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 457 KiBAbout 457 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and FontAwesome CDN and others), adding 605 KiB and 317 ms of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 46 KiB46 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 163 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
63 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify JavaScript
21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 364 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 28 ms
28 msYour server sent the HTML in 28 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.9 s
27.9 sYour largest element takes 27.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Grant Applications Now Open | Due by November 20, 2026”.
Time to Interactive: 27.9 s
27.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sThe first text or image appears after 5.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.8 s
8.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 67% slower for real visitors
+67%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 67 ms to 73 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 79 ms
79 msReal visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 113 ms
113 msScripts block the page for only 113 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.032
0.032The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.032, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.9 MB in 69 requests
11.9 MBYour homepage downloads 11.9 MB in 69 requests on a phone: images 10.3 MB (27), scripts 985 KiB (18) and stylesheets 421 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images over 500 KB
4 images weigh 9.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
6.0 MB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Cells-Solo.jpg at 4,164 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 6.0 MB.
8 images in older formats
8 images (9.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (51 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.4 g of CO₂ per visit
3.37 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.37 g of CO₂e: 404.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
8 buttons without a name
8 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
7 tap targets too small
7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
14 images without alt text
14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h4 → h6 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “HOME - Legend Biotech”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
6 H1 headlines
There are 6 <h1> headlines (“Grant Applications Now Open | Due by November 20,…”, “10,000+ Patients Treated to Date” and “Helping Redefine What is Possible in Cell Therapy”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
23 links with vague text
23 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Meta description is long (220 characters)
Your meta description is 220 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
44 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 44 pages on legendbiotech.com and 16 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://legendbiotech.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://legendbiotech.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://legendbiotech.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (606 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
https://legendbiotech.com/leadership, https://legendbiotech.com/locations, https://legendbiotech.com/sustainability, https://legendbiotech.com/research-development/publications, https://legendbiotech.com/conference-materials and https://legendbiotech.com/elite have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 small tap targets
10 of 38 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: “10,000+ Patients”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 711 words of copy
The homepage carries about 711 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.
14 calls to action
The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “CONTACT US”, “LEARN MORE” and “Contact Us”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at legendbiotech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Hiring
- Hiring
- 74 open roles
- Teams
- US Quality Operations (6), Facilities & Engineering (5), HR Operations & Compliance (5), Operations - Raritan (5)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- legendbiotech.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Employees
- 3,610
- Founded
- 2014
- Headquarters
- Jiangning District
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on legendbiotech.com, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.