Website review, no card needed

legrand.co.in logo

legrand.co.in website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202654 issues · 96 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on legrand.co.in, 17 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
235 ms163 msMay 9Oct 24227 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026173 ms
May 16, 2026171 ms
May 23, 2026172 ms
May 30, 2026172 ms
Jun 6, 2026173 ms
Jun 13, 2026177 ms
Jun 20, 2026178 ms
Jun 27, 2026180 ms
Jul 4, 2026180 ms
Jul 11, 2026180 ms
Jul 18, 2026180 ms
Jul 25, 2026183 ms
Aug 1, 2026191 ms
Aug 8, 2026200 ms
Aug 15, 2026210 ms
Aug 22, 2026215 ms
Aug 29, 2026216 ms
Sep 5, 2026214 ms
Sep 12, 2026214 ms
Sep 19, 2026216 ms
Sep 26, 2026220 ms
Oct 3, 2026224 ms
Oct 10, 2026224 ms
Oct 17, 2026226 ms
Oct 24, 2026227 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of legrand.co.in (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. legrand.co.in at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. legrand.co.in at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. legrand.co.in at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. legrand.co.in at 4.3 s4.3 s
  5. legrand.co.in at 5.4 s5.4 s
  6. legrand.co.in at 6.5 s6.5 s
  7. legrand.co.in at 7.5 s7.5 s
  8. legrand.co.in at 8.6 s8.6 s

Speed

15 to fix56
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • 10,668 HTML elements

    The page has 10,668 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Google Tag Manager and Qualtrics and others), adding 1.0 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 MB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 87). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 98 KiB

    About 98 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 546 ms

    546 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 546 ms of main-thread work and 529 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 547 ms

    547 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 547 ms of main-thread work and 305 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    565 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 565 ms on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    550 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    447 KiB

    About 447 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 405 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    382 KiB

    2 images could be 382 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Server response: 665 ms

    665 ms

    Your server takes 665 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 26 KiB

    26 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 87 but mobile only 56. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 800 ms

    800 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 800 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 218 ms

    218 ms

    Real visitors wait 218 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors

    +32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 173 ms to 227 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Your largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Your favourite Legrand products, just a click away”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.9 s).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix53
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    lp_mobile_banner_v2.jpg weighs 526 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 97 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 97 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (26), images 902 KiB (27) and fonts 316 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    lp_mobile_banner_v2.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (790 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.75 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.75 g of CO₂e: 90.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7786
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (3 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • 86 images without alt text

    86 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 16 form fields without a label

    16 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 10 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8577
  • Title is long (73 characters)

    Your title is 73 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Legrand India - Modular Switches Home Automation Switch Board IoT Devices”.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Your favourite Legrand products, just a click away”, “Arteor Advance.Intuitive by design” and “Data Center Solutions: Built for agility”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (182 characters)

    Your meta description is 182 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 375 internal links, 91 external

    The homepage links to 375 pages on legrand.co.in and 91 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.legrand.co.in/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.legrand.co.in/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, url, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.legrand.co.in/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (8,701 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix78
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.legrand.co.in/boq-cart declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.legrand.co.in/boq-cart all use the title “Legrand India - Modular Switches Home Automation Switch Board IoT Dev…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.legrand.co.in/smart-spaces/everything-you-need-to-know-about-surge-protection-devices has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://www.legrand.co.in/support, https://www.legrand.co.in/contact-us, https://www.legrand.co.in/boq-cart, https://www.legrand.co.in/switches-accessories/living-now and https://www.legrand.co.in/switches-accessories/arteor-advance took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 167 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9276
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.legrand.co.in/.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    22 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 8,133 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 8,133 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NOW”.

  • 24 calls to action

    The homepage has 24 calls to action, for example “CONTACT US”, “Shop Online” and “Download”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 478 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at legrand.co.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on legrand.co.in, including 25 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25