Website review, no card needed

lerta.energy logo

lerta.energy website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202637 issues · 76 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on lerta.energy, 15 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.2 sMay 2Jul 251.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.6 s
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
159 ms115 msMay 2Jul 25125 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026120 ms
May 9, 2026124 ms
May 16, 2026124 ms
May 23, 2026132 ms
May 30, 2026138 ms
Jun 6, 2026145 ms
Jun 13, 2026154 ms
Jul 25, 2026125 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lerta.energy (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lerta.energy at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lerta.energy at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. lerta.energy at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. lerta.energy at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. lerta.energy at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. lerta.energy at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. lerta.energy at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. lerta.energy at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix48
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 12.7 MB

    41 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12.7 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 732 KiB

    About 732 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 65). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.6 MB

    7 images could be 2.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Minify JavaScript

    514 KiB

    514 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 461 ms

    461 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 461 ms of main-thread work and 501 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 409 ms

    409 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 409 ms of main-thread work and 730 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 194 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    66 KiB

    About 66 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix46
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Your largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Nasze rozwiązania w zakresie energii słonecznej i odnawialn…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.5 s

    18.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 760 ms

    760 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 760 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix43
  • Page weight: 14.5 MB in 75 requests

    14.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.5 MB in 75 requests on a phone: media 8.1 MB (1), images 3.3 MB (22) and scripts 2.2 MB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    892 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example generators-thumb-712x712.webp at 712 px wide, shown at 56 px. Resized copies would save about 892 KiB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (944 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.10 g of CO₂e: 491.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8289
  • 16 text elements with low contrast

    16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links must have discernible text (4 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 16 images without alt text

    16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8387
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 63 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 63 pages on lerta.energy and 26 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 115 characters

    Your meta description is 115 characters: “Kompletne rozwiązania w zakresie energii słonecznej i fotowoltaiki. Od rozwoju projektu PV po obsługę i utrzymanie.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Dołącz do zielonej transformacji”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Powering the Future | Photon Energy”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.photonenergy.pl/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.photonenergy.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,021 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 12 pages without a meta description

    https://www.photonenergy.pl/pl/kontakt, https://www.photonenergy.pl/pl/rozwiazanie/korzysci-z-elastycznosci-energetycznej, https://www.photonenergy.pl/pl/rozwiazanie/rynek-mocy-demand-side-response, https://www.photonenergy.pl/pl/rozwiazanie/dostawy-energii, https://www.photonenergy.pl/pl/rozwiazanie/uslugi-systemowe and https://www.photonenergy.pl/pl/rozwiazanie/systemy-magazynowania-energii and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 838 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 838 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Subscribe”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lerta.energy, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on lerta.energy, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25