Website review, no card needed
lesgrappes.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202647 issues · 90 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on lesgrappes.com, 13 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75C- #64,998 of 98,445 reviewed websitesbeats 30%
- #39,880 of 53,747 online storesbeats 22%
- #37,571 of 48,754 Shopify storesbeats 19%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 139 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.1 s
3.2 s
4.3 s
5.3 s
6.4 s
7.5 s
8.5 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 6.5 s
A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
5,678 HTML elements
The page has 5,678 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and weglot.com and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 854 KiBAbout 854 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 339 KiB8 images could be 339 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 255 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (255 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 314 ms
314 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 314 ms of main-thread work and 474 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 311 ms
311 msShopify costs a phone 311 ms of main-thread work and 275 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
clevertar.app adds 80 ms
80 msclevertar.app costs a phone 80 ms of main-thread work and 359 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 125 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
49 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
17 KiBAbout 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 16 ms
16 msYour server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 24.4 s
24.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.5 s
7.5 sYour largest element takes 7.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Speed Index: 7.6 s
7.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 236 ms
236 msReal visitors wait 236 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 379 ms
379 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 379 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.042
0.042The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.042, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.6 MB in 266 requests
4.6 MBYour homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 266 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (88), images 1.2 MB (37) and other files 1.0 MB (113). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Bouteilles_Franc_Jeu_au_soleil_mediterraneen_1_9fb34b7f-901e is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
123 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example LESGRAPPES_-_LOGOTYPE_RVB.png at 9,697 px wide, shown at 161 px. Resized copies would save about 123 KiB.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (182 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.32 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.32 g of CO₂e: 157.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
21 text elements with low contrast
21 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
20 tap targets too small
20 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 93 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Acheter du vin directement auprès des vignerons” and “FAQ”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("Liquid error (snippets/microdata-schema line 31): inval…”.
19 links crawlers can't follow
19 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
418 internal links, 29 external
The homepage links to 418 pages on lesgrappes.com and 29 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 112 characters
Your meta description is 112 characters: “Vente de vin en ligne : 3 500 vins de 2 000 vignerons indépendants et récoltants. Livraison 48h France & Europe.”.
Title: 48 characters
Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Achat de vins direct aux vignerons | Les Grappes”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.lesgrappes.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lesgrappes.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,548 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.lesgrappes.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 22 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.lesgrappes.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.lesgrappes.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.lesgrappes.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.lesgrappes.com/pages/livraison, https://www.lesgrappes.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.lesgrappes.com/pages/franc-jeu and https://www.lesgrappes.com/collections have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.lesgrappes.com/collections/pour-un-diner-a-deux, https://www.lesgrappes.com/collections/pour-un-repas-de-fete and https://www.lesgrappes.com/collections/petits-prix took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 154 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
27 small tap targets
27 of 103 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “An error has been thrown while configuring your widget AbortError: signal is aborted without reason AbortError: signal …”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,921 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,921 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
53 short forms
53 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
34 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lesgrappes.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on lesgrappes.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.