Website review, no card needed
lidl.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202634 issues · 82 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on lidl.com, 14 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 163 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
3.7 s
7.5 s
11.2 s
15.0 s
18.7 s
22.5 s
26.2 s
30.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.2 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.7 s · 547 KiB31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (547 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.0 s · 432 KiBAbout 432 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.5 s · 288 KiBAbout 288 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 13.0 MB25 images could be 13.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 567 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,628 HTML elements
The page has 1,628 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon and leaflets.schwarz), adding 240 KiB and 95 ms of main-thread time.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 21 ms
21 msYour server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.6 s
15.6 sYour largest element takes 15.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s
7.0 sThe first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 15.9 s
15.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.3 s
10.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.15
0.15For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
35 images without width and height
35 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.155
0.155The layout shifts by 0.155 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 153 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 186 ms
186 msReal visitors wait 186 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 574 ms
574 msReal visitors wait 574 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 37% faster for real visitors
-37%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 3 ms
3 msScripts block the page for only 3 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 23.7 MB in 144 requests
23.7 MBYour homepage downloads 23.7 MB in 144 requests on a phone: images 22.0 MB (55), scripts 730 KiB (43) and fonts 464 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
15 images far larger than shown
8.0 MB15 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example AW41_MarketingStageTeasers_LidlPlusDeals-Mobile-2488880.jpg at 10,000 px wide, shown at 853 px. Resized copies would save about 8.0 MB.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 4.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
16 images in older formats
16 images (8.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
AW41_MarketingStageTeasers_LidlPlusDeals-Mobile-2488880.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (29 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 6.7 g of CO₂ per visit
6.71 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.71 g of CO₂e: 805.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 46 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is short (39 characters)
Your meta description is only 39 characters: “Lidl US | Grocery Store | More to Value”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
162 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 162 pages on lidl.com and 12 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Weekly Deals”.
Title: 39 characters
Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Lidl US | Grocery Store | More to Value”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.lidl.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lidl.com/static/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (493 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
/mla has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
15 pages without a meta description
/c/offers-leaflets/s10092873, /mla, /c/lidl-plus/s10093874, /c/food-wine/s10068374, /c/kitchen-household/s10068166 and /c/diy-garden/s10068222 and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages without an H1
/mla, /c/lidl-plus/s10093874, /c/taste-of-the-world/s10093879, /c/store-finder/s10089075, /c/leave-your-review/s10095204 and /c/about-us/s10089074 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/mla has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 118 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
50 of 52 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 448 words of copy
The homepage carries about 448 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start Searching” and “Learn More”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Sign Up Now” and “Contact Us”.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lidl.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on lidl.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.