Website review, no card needed

lidl.com logo

lidl.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202634 issues · 82 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on lidl.com, 14 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s1.9 sApr 18Oct 32.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20263.6 s
Apr 25, 20263.5 s
May 2, 20263.5 s
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.7 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
171 ms147 msApr 18Oct 3163 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026153 ms
Apr 25, 2026152 ms
May 2, 2026153 ms
May 9, 2026155 ms
May 16, 2026157 ms
May 23, 2026160 ms
May 30, 2026161 ms
Jun 6, 2026160 ms
Jun 13, 2026158 ms
Jun 20, 2026157 ms
Jun 27, 2026159 ms
Jul 4, 2026152 ms
Jul 11, 2026151 ms
Jul 18, 2026150 ms
Jul 25, 2026151 ms
Aug 1, 2026155 ms
Aug 8, 2026159 ms
Aug 15, 2026161 ms
Aug 22, 2026163 ms
Aug 29, 2026163 ms
Sep 5, 2026166 ms
Sep 12, 2026168 ms
Sep 19, 2026166 ms
Sep 26, 2026164 ms
Oct 3, 2026163 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lidl.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lidl.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  2. lidl.com at 7.5 s7.5 s
  3. lidl.com at 11.2 s11.2 s
  4. lidl.com at 15.0 s15.0 s
  5. lidl.com at 18.7 s18.7 s
  6. lidl.com at 22.5 s22.5 s
  7. lidl.com at 26.2 s26.2 s
  8. lidl.com at 30.0 s30.0 s

Speed

8 to fix49
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.2 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.7 s · 547 KiB

    31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (547 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.0 s · 432 KiB

    About 432 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.5 s · 288 KiB

    About 288 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 13.0 MB

    25 images could be 13.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 567 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,628 HTML elements

    The page has 1,628 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon and leaflets.schwarz), adding 240 KiB and 95 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.6 s

    15.6 s

    Your largest element takes 15.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.9 s

    15.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.15

    0.15

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • 35 images without width and height

    35 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.155

    0.155

    The layout shifts by 0.155 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 153 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 186 ms

    186 ms

    Real visitors wait 186 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 574 ms

    574 ms

    Real visitors wait 574 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 37% faster for real visitors

    -37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 3 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix26
  • Page weight: 23.7 MB in 144 requests

    23.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 23.7 MB in 144 requests on a phone: images 22.0 MB (55), scripts 730 KiB (43) and fonts 464 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images far larger than shown

    8.0 MB

    15 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example AW41_MarketingStageTeasers_LidlPlusDeals-Mobile-2488880.jpg at 10,000 px wide, shown at 853 px. Resized copies would save about 8.0 MB.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 4.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (8.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    AW41_MarketingStageTeasers_LidlPlusDeals-Mobile-2488880.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (29 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 6.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.71 g of CO₂e: 805.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9797
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 46 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Meta description is short (39 characters)

    Your meta description is only 39 characters: “Lidl US | Grocery Store | More to Value”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 162 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 162 pages on lidl.com and 12 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Weekly Deals”.

  • Title: 39 characters

    Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Lidl US | Grocery Store | More to Value”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lidl.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lidl.com/static/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (493 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 1 page without a title

    /mla has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /c/offers-leaflets/s10092873, /mla, /c/lidl-plus/s10093874, /c/food-wine/s10068374, /c/kitchen-household/s10068166 and /c/diy-garden/s10068222 and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /mla, /c/lidl-plus/s10093874, /c/taste-of-the-world/s10093879, /c/store-finder/s10089075, /c/leave-your-review/s10095204 and /c/about-us/s10089074 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /mla has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 118 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    50 of 52 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix70
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 448 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 448 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start Searching” and “Learn More”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Sign Up Now” and “Contact Us”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lidl.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on lidl.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25