Website review, no card needed
limore.co.il website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202631 issues · 81 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on limore.co.il, 9 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84B- #19,599 of 107,891 reviewed websitesbeats 77%
- #12,746 of 61,077 online storesbeats 73%
- #12,379 of 55,732 Shopify storesbeats 71%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 120 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 76
76/100Your mobile performance score is 76. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 202 KiB7 images could be 202 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 285 ms
285 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 285 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 728 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,634 HTML elements
The page has 1,634 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, tctm.xyz and Shopify and others), adding 543 KiB and 387 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
214 KiBAbout 214 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Reduce unused CSS
160 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 183 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
6 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
6 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 6 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.8 s
4.8 sYour largest element takes 4.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 9.0 s
9.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.0 s
4.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 113 ms
113 msReal visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 782 ms
782 msReal visitors wait 782 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 179 ms
179 msScripts block the page for only 179 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.078
0.078The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.078, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.9 MB in 178 requests
5.9 MBYour homepage downloads 5.9 MB in 178 requests on a phone: media 3.5 MB (1), images 841 KiB (29) and other files 744 KiB (91). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
H8460103_iimor_Headers_Mobile.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.68 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.68 g of CO₂e: 201.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Positive tabindex
2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 52 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (75 characters)
Your title is 75 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “לימור – מומחים למוצרי ספיגה והיגיינה למבוגרים, שיחת ייעוץ ללא עלות – Limore”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (6 characters)
Your meta description is only 6 characters: “Limore”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Limore” and “Limore”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
145 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 145 pages on limore.co.il and 4 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://limore.co.il/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://limore.co.il/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://limore.co.il/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
13 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 13 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://limore.co.il/collections/%D7%97%D7%99%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%9C%D7%9E%D7%91%D7%95%D7%92%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D, whose canonical is https://limore.co.il/collections/%d7%97%d7%99%d7%aa%d7%95%d7%9c%d7%99%d7%9d-%d7%9c%d7%9e%d7%91%d7%95%d7%92%d7%a8%d7%99%d7%9d. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages share a meta description
https://limore.co.il/collections/%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%A8%D7%99-%D7%97%D7%99%D7%98%D7%95%D7%99-%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%99-%D7%94%D7%91%D7%99%D7%AA and https://limore.co.il/collections use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://limore.co.il/pages/contact has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
11 pages with very little text
https://limore.co.il/pages/contact, https://limore.co.il/collections/%D7%AA%D7%97%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%95%D7%AA%D7%97%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%9C%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D, https://limore.co.il/collections/%D7%9E%D7%92%D7%9F-%D7%9E%D7%96%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9F-%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%93%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA, https://limore.co.il/collections/%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%A8%D7%99-%D7%A4%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%9D, https://limore.co.il/collections/%D7%9E%D7%92%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%92%D7%99-%D7%A8%D7%97%D7%A6%D7%94 and https://limore.co.il/collections/%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%98%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D and 5 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“CSS appearance value `slider-vertical` is not standardized and will be removed.”).
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
54 of 54 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 23 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 117 words
The homepage has only about 117 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at limore.co.il, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on limore.co.il, including 10 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.