Website review, no card needed

lino-jp.jp logo

lino-jp.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202641 issues · 88 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on lino-jp.jp, 18 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.4 sMay 23Nov 72.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Oct 31, 20262.7 s
Nov 7, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
96 ms72 msMay 23Nov 787 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202691 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202686 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202683 ms
Jun 27, 202684 ms
Jul 4, 202687 ms
Jul 11, 202685 ms
Jul 18, 202687 ms
Jul 25, 202687 ms
Aug 1, 202689 ms
Aug 8, 202692 ms
Aug 15, 202691 ms
Aug 22, 202693 ms
Aug 29, 202692 ms
Sep 5, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 202685 ms
Sep 19, 202675 ms
Sep 26, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202680 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202689 ms
Oct 24, 202689 ms
Oct 31, 202690 ms
Nov 7, 202687 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lino-jp.jp (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lino-jp.jp at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lino-jp.jp at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. lino-jp.jp at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. lino-jp.jp at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. lino-jp.jp at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. lino-jp.jp at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. lino-jp.jp at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. lino-jp.jp at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix55
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.3 s · 839 KiB

    About 839 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 250 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (250 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 5.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,999 HTML elements

    The page has 3,999 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Shopify adds 511 ms

    511 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 511 ms of main-thread work and 667 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 466 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    360 ms · 100 KiB

    About 100 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 360 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    61 KiB

    1 image could be 61 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    25 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.6 s

    19.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Your largest element takes 5.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 91 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 589 ms

    589 ms

    Real visitors wait 589 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011

    0.011

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.8 MB in 367 requests

    3.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 367 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (118), other files 1.2 MB (217) and images 472 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.09 g of CO₂e: 130.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7988
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • <dt> and <dd> elements must be contained by a <dl> (28 elements)

    <dt> and <dd> elements must be contained by a <dl>: 28 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <dl> elements must only directly contain properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements (14 elements)

    <dl> elements must only directly contain properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 38 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10086
  • Title is short (11 characters)

    Your title is only 11 characters: “LINO – Lino”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is short (55 characters)

    Your meta description is only 55 characters: “「我們是LINO,提供你在台灣也可以方便買到日本商品的日本選物店。」 購買優惠不間斷~免運、折扣、贈禮大放送!”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 532 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 532 pages on lino-jp.jp and 7 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “<img src="//www.lino-jp.jp/cdn/shop/files/logo_daa25a9e-3676-46b8-8303-6a435301b093_130x.png?v=1614226335" srcset="//ww…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lino-jp.jp/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lino-jp.jp/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (401 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.lino-jp.jp/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://www.lino-jp.jp/collections/all, https://www.lino-jp.jp/collections/frontpage, https://www.lino-jp.jp/collections/%E7%B6%9C%E5%90%88%E7%B6%AD%E4%BB%96%E5%91%BD, https://www.lino-jp.jp/collections/%E8%A3%9C%E9%88%A3-%E8%AD%B7%E9%AA%A8, https://www.lino-jp.jp/collections/%E8%82%9D%E6%A9%9F%E8%83%BD%E6%94%B9%E5%96%84-%E7%96%B2%E5%80%A6-%E4%B9%8F%E5%8A%9B and https://www.lino-jp.jp/collections/%E9%9D%92%E6%98%A5%E7%97%98-%E7%BE%8E%E8%82%8C-%E5%8F%A3%E5%85%A7%E7%82%8E-%E8%99%9B%E5%86%B7 and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 12 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.lino-jp.jp/pages/%E9%97%9C%E6%96%BClino, whose canonical is https://www.lino-jp.jp/pages/%e9%97%9c%e6%96%bclino. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 198 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://hulkapps-wishlist.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/assets/images/twitter.svg.

  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 28 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot convert undefined or null to object”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 223 words

    The homepage has only about 223 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Subscribe”.

  • 7 short forms

    7 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 23 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lino-jp.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 4 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Inbox · nfcube.com · klaviyo.com · Swym Wishlist Plus

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on lino-jp.jp, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25