Website review, no card needed

linquest.com logo

linquest.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202635 issues · 104 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on linquest.com, 13 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 242.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
100 ms93 msMay 9Oct 2496 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202699 ms
May 16, 202698 ms
May 23, 202698 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202697 ms
Jul 18, 202698 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 202696 ms
Aug 8, 202696 ms
Aug 15, 202695 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202696 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202697 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 202697 ms
Oct 17, 202697 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of linquest.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. linquest.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. linquest.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. linquest.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. linquest.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. linquest.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. linquest.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. linquest.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. linquest.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

linquest.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix56
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 s · 5.6 MB

    53 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.6 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.0 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 453 KiB

    About 453 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, blackfire.io and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 1.4 MB and 453 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    310 ms · 64 KiB

    About 64 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 188 ms

    188 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 188 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Cloudflare CDN adds 89 ms

    89 ms

    Cloudflare CDN costs a phone 89 ms of main-thread work and 748 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    30 KiB

    4 images could be 30 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 803 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.26

    0.26

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.26 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    Your largest element takes 14.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “This website may collect your data. The collected data coul…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.3 s

    14.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 12 images without width and height

    12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 99 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 101 ms

    101 ms

    Real visitors wait 101 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 569 ms

    569 ms

    Real visitors wait 569 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 128 ms

    128 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 128 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 7.3 MB in 104 requests

    7.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 104 requests on a phone: media 4.7 MB (6), scripts 979 KiB (28) and images 956 KiB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.06 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.06 g of CO₂e: 247.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 10096
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 33 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8589
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 14 links with vague text

    14 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 7 links crawlers can't follow

    7 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 57 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 57 pages on linquest.com and 12 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 105 characters

    Your meta description is 105 characters: “KBR delivers science, technology and engineering solutions to governments and companies around the world.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Delivering Solutions, Changing the World®”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “KBR | Delivering Solutions, Changing the World”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.kbr.com/en.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kbr.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (806 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    /en and / all use the title “KBR | Delivering Solutions, Changing the World”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is /en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    16 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://linquest.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • 3 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://linquest.com goes through 3 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.kbr.com/careers.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (kbr.com).

  • Valid certificate (27 days left)

    The certificate from Certainly · Certainly Intermediate R1 verifies for linquest.com and is valid for another 27 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 50 links work

    All 50 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 10 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    kbr.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    kbr.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 25 years old

    25 years

    kbr.com was registered in Feb 2001 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Feb 2027

    kbr.com is registered until Feb 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 603 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 603 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Apply” and “Learn More”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be linquest.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx ip4:205.129.5.194 ip4:205.129.5.220 ip4:18.252.151.99 ip4:12.53.9.226 ip4:18.253.122.12 include:spf2.linquest…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
2003
Headquarters
Los Angeles

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on linquest.com, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25