Website review, no card needed
liplab.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202644 issues · 91 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on liplab.com, 18 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70C- #81,999 of 97,881 reviewed websitesbeats 14%
- #47,996 of 53,367 online storesbeats 8%
- #44,283 of 48,397 Shopify storesbeats 7%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 387 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 321 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 95 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
16.2 s · 2.1 MBAbout 2.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.2 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.9 s · 1.1 MB81 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 61 KiBAbout 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.6 s
A phone's processor spends 6.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Vimeo, clarip.com and Facebook and others), adding 19.3 MB and 828 ms of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 193 ms
193 msVimeo costs a phone 193 ms of main-thread work and 17.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 710 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
393 KiB7 images could be 393 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
clarip.com adds 176 ms
176 msclarip.com costs a phone 176 ms of main-thread work and 442 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,764 HTML elements
The page has 1,764 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 62 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.7 s
4.7 sReal visitors wait 4.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 33.4 s
33.4 sYour largest element takes 33.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 19.0 s
19.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 41.0 s
41.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 55% slower for real visitors
+55%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.124
0.124The layout shifts by 0.124 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 532 ms
532 msReal visitors wait 532 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 73% faster for real visitors
-73%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 387 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 46.4 MB in 380 requests
46.4 MBYour homepage downloads 46.4 MB in 380 requests on a phone: media 23.9 MB (5), other files 15.9 MB (173) and scripts 4.1 MB (96). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
M-HERO_BANNER-PINK_750x.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 13.2 g of CO₂ per visit
13.16 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 13.16 g of CO₂e: 1578.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (294 characters)
Your meta description is 294 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
93 internal links, 21 external
The homepage links to 93 pages on liplab.com and 21 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 39 characters
Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Lip Lab | Custom lip color, made by you”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.liplab.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.liplab.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (735 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.liplab.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.liplab.com/pages/experience and https://www.liplab.com/pages/host-a-party have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
https://www.liplab.com/products/custom-re-order, https://www.liplab.com/pages/experience, https://www.liplab.com/pages/host-a-party, https://www.liplab.com/pages/lip-lab-corporate-events, https://www.liplab.com/products/gift-card and https://www.liplab.com/products/ready-set-lips-set and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 broken images
9 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.liplab.com/.
13 small tap targets
13 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Requests the geolocation permission on page load.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 461 words of copy
The homepage carries about 461 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Now” and “BOOK NOW”.
15 calls to action
The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “BOOK NOW”, “Shop All” and “Pricing”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
42 cookies set on arrival
42Opening the homepage sets 42 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
45 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at liplab.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 5 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Tolstoy · Attentive · cloudfront.net · klaviyo.com · attn.tv
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2022.
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on liplab.com, including 23 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.